Some plugins has MIT license, while not really following it

[Aijokey]

Some of plugins shows that their license is MIT, while no source available. I think there should be some moderation about it

[bajrangCoder]

We check the licensing things maybe there will be some loophole.
Btw Can you list them so we can take action on those plugins

[Aijokey]

Almost any premium plugin with MIT license, like abread crumb or any other plugin from dev. sourav

[RohitKushvaha01]

Some of plugins shows that their license is MIT, while no source available. I think there should be some moderation about it

The MIT License does not require the publisher to provide source code. It only requires that the license text and copyright notice be included with any distribution, such as the plugin ZIP file itself. Distributing a binary (e.g., minified or compiled files) under MIT is fully compliant, even without source access.

[Aijokey]

I see. I previously misunderstood MIT license

[UnschooledGamer]

@Aijokey clauses of MIT licence can be seen & Learnt at

• https://opensource.org/license/mit
• https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License
• https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1fzegb4/am_i_misunderstanding_the_mit_license/