Skip to content

Maybe replace the denseCRF to the author's python version can improve the result? #1

Description

@heng-yuwen

Hi, I found the link to the author, https://github.com/paulu/material-seg. They provided a Python version denseCRF. Also, they provided enough code for testing. Will it be better to replace the denseCRF to the author's version, to get better result?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions