Bug report
Bug description:
As far as I can see, the --with-dbm-liborder option doesn't know about sqlite, and configuring without it defaults to
checking for --with-dbmliborder... gdbm:ndbm:bdb
Lib/dbm/init.py however mentions sqlite ...
_names = ['dbm.sqlite3', 'dbm.gnu', 'dbm.ndbm', 'dbm.dumb']
Am I reading that wrong, and sqlite isn't yet supported as an implementation for the dbm module?
CPython versions tested on:
3.14, 3.15
Operating systems tested on:
No response
Bug report
Bug description:
As far as I can see, the --with-dbm-liborder option doesn't know about sqlite, and configuring without it defaults to
Lib/dbm/init.py however mentions sqlite ...
Am I reading that wrong, and sqlite isn't yet supported as an implementation for the dbm module?
CPython versions tested on:
3.14, 3.15
Operating systems tested on:
No response