You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Loupe has no path to produce a standards-conformant PDF. #21 covers PDF/X policy validation and normalized conformance findings — reporting whether a file conforms. Nothing converts a file to conformance, and PDF/A is not addressed at all.
Verified: no PDF/X or PDF/A conversion path in the engine or PdfTool; no output-intent authoring; no /GTS_PDFXVersion writing; no PDF/A identification metadata.
For the target user this is a routine daily requirement, not an advanced feature:
Trade printers, brand owners, and ad-delivery specs demand PDF/X-1a, X-3, or X-4 as the exchange format. A shop that receives a non-conformant file and needs to deliver a conformant one currently has to leave Loupe.
The wedge ends at "verified press-ready output". For a large share of real jobs, "press-ready" is a PDF/X conformance claim. Validating and reporting non-conformance without a remedy stops one step short of the product's own stated outcome.
PDF/A matters for the archival copy of a job — a real requirement for regulated and government print work, and a natural fit for a product that already keeps an operation ledger.
Scope
Conversion to PDF/X, targeting the parts that matter commercially: X-1a (requires flattening — see the transparency-flattening issue in this epic), X-3, and X-4. Cover output-intent embedding, colour-space normalization, font embedding, transparency policy, and the metadata/identification the standard requires.
Conversion to PDF/A, at the level actually needed for archival deliverables, with the conformance level explicitly chosen and recorded rather than implied.
A pre-conversion report: what will change, what cannot be made conformant automatically, and what requires an operator decision. Conversion that silently alters colour or substitutes a font is exactly the opaque behaviour the product boundary rules out ("not an opaque generative editing system for production PDFs").
Post-conversion validation using an independent validator, not the engine that performed the conversion. Self-validation of a conversion is not evidence. docs/PACKAGING_LICENSING.md already contemplates optional veraPDF — settle that dependency here, including its licensing consequences.
Registration as a semantic operation under the shared contract, available identically from Editor, PdfTool, and PageMaster.
Record the claim boundary: which standards and levels Loupe asserts it can produce, and which it can only validate. An overstated conformance claim is a commercial liability.
Acceptance criteria
Conversion to each supported target produces output that an independent validator accepts.
Conversion that cannot reach conformance fails with a report naming each blocking condition, and never emits a file claiming conformance it does not have. A wrongly-claimed /GTS_PDFXVersion is worse than no conversion.
The pre-conversion report enumerates colour, font, and transparency changes before execution.
Identical semantics across Editor, PdfTool, and PageMaster.
The supported-standards claim is documented and matches what the tests cover.
Test strategy
Fixture set per target: already-conformant input (must be a no-op or a minimal, justified change), convertible input, and unconvertible input (must fail closed).
Part of #155.
Problem
Loupe has no path to produce a standards-conformant PDF. #21 covers PDF/X policy validation and normalized conformance findings — reporting whether a file conforms. Nothing converts a file to conformance, and PDF/A is not addressed at all.
Verified: no PDF/X or PDF/A conversion path in the engine or
PdfTool; no output-intent authoring; no/GTS_PDFXVersionwriting; no PDF/A identification metadata.For the target user this is a routine daily requirement, not an advanced feature:
Scope
docs/PACKAGING_LICENSING.mdalready contemplates optional veraPDF — settle that dependency here, including its licensing consequences.PdfTool, and PageMaster.Acceptance criteria
/GTS_PDFXVersionis worse than no conversion.PdfTool, and PageMaster.Test strategy
Dependencies
docs/PACKAGING_LICENSING.md— veraPDF is already flagged as an optional dependency with licensing implications; this issue forces the decision.