Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Scope and compatibility
This is a compiler-only, opt-in change. It does not add or rename opcodes, change RTL, or modify the default row-major/per-pair/blocking path. A direct comparison against main produced the same 74 non-comment instructions and the same SHA256 for the default path.
Grouped lowering is intentionally limited to fixed-route or trace-replay programs where expert groups are known when code is generated. It does not claim runtime grouping for device-selected routes; that still needs a runtime sort/segment mechanism.
The rejected experimental deep-ring and cross-expert panel-pool implementations are not included.
Validation