Describe the bug
The pattern generated for the namespace has only a subset of the valid parts as there is a typo in the ABNF.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Go to https://certcc.github.io/SSVC/data/abnf/ssvc_namespace_pattern.abnf
- Look for the
privateuse part of BCP47 statement in the ABNF and compare it to the structure given in figure 1 in RFC 5646:
SSVC: "x" 1*( "-" 2*8ALNUM ) vs RFC 5646: "x" 1*("-" (1*8alphanum))
Expected behavior
SSVC should use "x" 1*( "-" 1*8ALNUM )
Platform details
Include any relevant details like OS, browser, versions, etc.
Additional context
Relevant for CSAF; found in oasis-tcs/csaf#1549 (comment)
Flagging @sei-vsarvepalli for attention
Describe the bug
The pattern generated for the namespace has only a subset of the valid parts as there is a typo in the ABNF.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
privateusepart of BCP47 statement in the ABNF and compare it to the structure given in figure 1 in RFC 5646:SSVC:
"x" 1*( "-" 2*8ALNUM )vs RFC 5646:"x" 1*("-" (1*8alphanum))Expected behavior
SSVC should use
"x" 1*( "-" 1*8ALNUM )Platform details
Include any relevant details like OS, browser, versions, etc.
Additional context
Relevant for CSAF; found in oasis-tcs/csaf#1549 (comment)
Flagging @sei-vsarvepalli for attention