Skip to content

๐ŸŽจ Palette: ์•…๋ณด ๋ทฐ์–ด ์•„์ด์ฝ˜ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ ํˆดํŒ ๋ฐ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๊ฐœ์„  - #1233

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
feat/ux-score-viewer-tooltips-4355712853197815450
Draft

seonghobae wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
feat/ux-score-viewer-tooltips-4355712853197815450

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Draft owner/consolidation status

Protected base is develop@314ddeae7b775a4957594b599358c8255617eb2e; exact head is b794906f152503459fdb5f156dcf09a6305af350. This PR is intentionally Open / Draft / mergeable.

The two-file delta adds shared Base UI tooltips to ScoreViewer zoom/page icon controls and keeps first/last page controls keyboard-focusable with aria-disabled plus activation guards. That is a valid buyer-facing accessibility direction, but the generated PR was prematurely Ready: all exact-head repository workflows were still queued and there was no formal current-head review submission.

Single-writer finding

Active Draft #1145 already owns ScoreViewer.tsx, ScoreViewer.test.tsx, ScoreView.tsx, ScoreView.test.tsx, pdfjs.ts and pdfjs.test.ts for the bounded Score/PDF semantic-identifier/ACL migration (data โ†’ scorePdfBytes, distinct viewer/render cancellation authorities, semantic viewer state names and vendor-boundary translation). #1233 currently edits two of those same owner files directly from protected develop.

Do not merge #1233 independently while that overlapping source owner remains unresolved. The tooltip interaction delta must be adopted/adapted through one canonical Score/PDF owner using ordinary descendant/non-force consolidation; neither branch's predecessor checks/reviews transfer to the consolidated head. The current #1233 source is preserved until that succession is verified rather than closed or force-rewritten.

Accessibility / evidence boundary

The current source-level contract proves only that the previous/next controls expose aria-disabled and the click handlers fail closed at page boundaries. Tooltip copy currently repeats the action label; it does not independently establish a boundary-reason description. jsdom/source evidence is not browser proof of hover/focus persistence, Escape dismissal, pointer/touch hit geometry, 400% zoom/reflow, forced-colors, or Narrator/VoiceOver behavior.

No exact-head workflow is promoted from queued/pending to success, and CodeRabbit's no-actionable-comment summary is not a qualifying independent approval. Keep Draft until source ownership is consolidated and one unchanged final head/base has applicable CI/build/security/SAST/SBOM/coverage gates terminal-success, zero valid findings, current-head browser/accessibility evidence for the material interaction, and qualifying independent non-author approval.

No self-approval, force-push, destructive rebase, gate weakening, synthetic status, no-op freshness commit, or duplicate ScoreViewer source writer.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

๐Ÿ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a ๐Ÿ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. ๐ŸŽ‰

โ„น๏ธ Recent review info
โš™๏ธ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: c83f8807-bb85-4a75-8d83-5bd4aed5ae67

๐Ÿ“ฅ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 314ddea and b794906.

๐Ÿ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsx
  • apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.tsx

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


๐Ÿ“ Walkthrough

Walkthrough

ScoreViewer์˜ ํ™•๋Œ€/์ถ•์†Œ ๋ฐ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์ด๋™ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค์ด Tooltip ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋„๋ก ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” aria-disabled๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ํด๋ฆญ์„ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ด€๋ จ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ์ƒํƒœ์™€ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์œ ์ง€ ๋™์ž‘์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Changes

ScoreViewer ์ปจํŠธ๋กค

Layer / File(s) Summary
Tooltip ์ปจํŠธ๋กค ๋ฐ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์ด๋™ ์ œ์–ด
apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.tsx
ํ™•๋Œ€/์ถ•์†Œ ๋ฐ ์ด์ „/๋‹ค์Œ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค์„ Tooltip ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ๊ฑฐ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์—์„œ aria-disabled๋ฅผ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ํด๋ฆญ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ปจํŠธ๋กค ์ƒํƒœ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ
apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsx
ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์˜ aria-disabled ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑ ์ด์ „/๋‹ค์Œ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์„ ํด๋ฆญํ•ด๋„ ํ˜„์žฌ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Priority: โฌ‡๏ธ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Feature

Merge Risk: โšช Minimal ยท up to b7949

The updated controls retain accessible names and page-boundary interaction behavior without a supported accessibility regression. The change is ready to merge.

๐Ÿšฅ Pre-merge checks | โœ… 5
โœ… Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage โœ… Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 2 files.
Linked Issues check โœ… Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check โœ… Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check โœ… Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbitโ€™s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check โœ… Passed ์ œ๋ชฉ์€ ์•…๋ณด ๋ทฐ์–ด ์•„์ด์ฝ˜ ๋ฒ„ํŠผ์˜ ํˆดํŒ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์™€ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ ๊ฐœ์„ ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ„๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
โœจ Finishing Touches
๐Ÿ“ Generate docstrings
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
๐Ÿงช Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

โค๏ธ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2026 16:10
@seonghobae seonghobae added enhancement New feature or request priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work labels Sep 19, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant