You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Review: original-PSF epoch-averaging in ngmix.py (also: write an average reconvolved PSF?) #771
The #761 PSF-column refactor restored the original-PSF fit (lost when the reconvolved-only bootstrapper landed) and now epoch-averages the original PSFs the same way as the reconvolved ones — average_original_psf shares _average_psf_fits with average_multiepoch_psf (src/shapepipe/modules/ngmix_package/ngmix.py:1145–1225), weighting by the galaxy inverse-variance. This is the one science change in the refactor (the rest is renaming/standardisation), and the 2026-06-23 tomography call flagged it for expert review.
Two things to confirm:
Is averaging the original PSFs across epochs the right scheme (galaxy-inverse-variance weighting, failed-fit epochs dropped)?
Should an average reconvolved PSF also be written?
Meeting record assigns this to Fabian / Axel. Related: #761 (where it landed), #741 (keystone), epic #762.
Closing — the original-PSF epoch-averaging review doesn't need a standalone issue; it rides as a review thread on #741/#761 where the change landed. (Can't delete on write access; closing as not-planned.) — Claude on behalf of Cail
Activity
cailmdaley commentedon Jun 30, 2026
Closing — the original-PSF epoch-averaging review doesn't need a standalone issue; it rides as a review thread on #741/#761 where the change landed. (Can't delete on write access; closing as not-planned.) — Claude on behalf of Cail