Repository navigation
Bound the idle cover of the chain-nested root, its top targets and its best shape (no κ) - #6836
Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
No new kappa. Exact checks on the literal chain-nested root caller. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Nov 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No new κ. Four scoped statements about the chain-nested root of #6833, each with its hypotheses, proved or checked exactly on the literal words.
(g|g)(siteihas|M_i| - 2 = iidle directions), every cover by whole idle jobs that lie on one side, with a native active part of rank at most two and price(8m)^tfor0 < t ≤ 1, costs at least2 Σ_{s=1}^{g-1} (8s)^t; for0 < t < 1equality holds exactly for the chain's job lengthsg-1, ..., 1. Proof: rank subadditivity, a Gale-Ryser majorization and Karamata's inequality. Targets are fixed by the masks, so any other cover has a strictly larger paid side. Jobs on both sides, native stages of rank three, or a convex price lower the minimum (controls). No idle line is transported from a left to a right site through the three thin queries (exact overQ,g = 3, 4, 9).nfields,n + 1square-zero queries, constant bases, one variable per site,J = -I) the product identity makes a conjugated Gram matrix rank one, which forces a field in every full mask (target rank 145 at 18 stages) and, through a three-site sign argument, a prefix field and a suffix field of total weight at least 18. The three largest target ranks sum to at least 291;{145, 73, 73}of Conditional κ = 0.00330720 (+3.000e-6, +0.09079% over #6716): two paid idle fragments unlock independent outputs #6726 and Conditional κ = 0.00337180 (+6.36e-5, +1.92% over #6824): replace the supplier tree by a chain-nested root #6833 attains it. The sum is forced, the split 73 + 73 is not.(4,4,1|1,4,4)up to relabelling, and the outer histograms differ by one cancelling pair of rank-32 jobs; the literal chain(9|9)word has no retirement candidate under the criterion of Prove the pure dual-pair retirement criterion and its unit-divisor count (no κ) #6827 (its census finds the three known cuts of the unretired Conditional κ = 0.00330720 (+3.000e-6, +0.09079% over #6716): two paid idle fragments unlock independent outputs #6726 caller). That every retirement of a shortest root is a mask reduction is not proved.(9|9)is the unique best chain shape on the complex histogram (crossing 0.00337180047549672) and on the binary histogram (crossing in (0.0038525393934, 0.0038525393935)), over all2^17compositions per side with the best binary tree per child; the runner-up(8|10)loses about 1.5e-6 (complex) and 1.9e-6 (binary) in κ at first order. A scaled-native model for 10 to 40 stages also peaks at 18.Exact checks: literal idle jobs of #6833 against the demand of all 18 sites; exhaustive minimum covers for
g = 2..9and 4,000 random covers; root identity at randomD, rank-one Gram on all triples and the residual identity on the chain and #6726 roots; ledger against the literal events of four built words andCALLER.json; fourteen negative controls.Base: 7c49fe3. Inputs are unmodified copies pinned in
retained/SOURCE-PINS.jsonto #6833 at ad24ad9, #6726 at 435bbe9 and #6827 at f0fbfd6.Reproduce (CPython 3.12, standard library):
Expected:
PASS_CHAIN_IDLE_COVER_OPTIMAL(normal and-O) andPASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE.Scope: one-sided idle jobs with active rank two;
J = -Iand exactlyn + 1queries for statement 2; finite statements for 3; the additive ledger of the chain-nested family for 4, with onlyN = 18literal. Cross-side jobs conjugated through other sites, other mask patterns and non-chain roots are not covered. Pricing, native phases and the five framework assumptions of the cited words are not re-derived and no κ changes.Overlap: #6832 gives the
N ≥ r + 1count used in the setting; #6774 excludes the four-site coupled root with a different method and scope; #6834 transfers the chain word to the binary native word and its crossing is reproduced here. No open or merged pull request states the idle-cover bound, the top-target sum or the exhaustive shape search.Credit #6833 (DreamingOfClouds) for the chain-nested root and caller, zxv (#6726), thu-nmrc (#6716), CubeJerry (#6805), Ali Romman and the caller/verifier lineage. Apache-2.0.
Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code