Skip to content

P104 surplus bound, hub rank law and form-capacity lemma with a hypothesis ledger (no kappa) - #6881

Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
DreamingOfClouds:research/p104-surplus-hub-form-note
Open

DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
DreamingOfClouds:research/p104-surplus-hub-form-note

Conversation

@DreamingOfClouds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claim. Research package research/p104-surplus-hub-form-note (complements #6868 and #6877). No new kappa and no word. Under an explicit hypothesis ledger it states:

  • the surplus identity S = 760 = v(L-1) - Lc at the selected record, recomputed from the stored profile;
  • the ratio lemma N >= 1 + dim ker(R+I) for words of isotropic rank-one units;
  • the surplus bound S <= sum_p (L_p - 1) - sum_j c_j, in which the target size cancels (conditional on H1-H6);
  • a hub rank law: rank Z(D) = v, the cocycle relation, divisibility, and at least v coordinates in every LOCAL mask, at every nonzero D (conditional on the coordinate-mask grammar);
  • a form-capacity lemma: ku >= v for every kd in a stated one-pass stop family;
  • label corrections: the identical-representative requirement at a scalar gate is a construction choice of the frame lemma, sufficient but not shown necessary, and symbolic exactness in D and ascend-only public paths are verifier behaviour.

Scope and caveats.

  • H1 and H4 rest partly on hand arguments, marked CONDITIONAL.
  • H5 (one hosted Q-odd unit per LOCAL) is a family assumption, not a theorem. With two, the same arithmetic allows 2632.
  • H6 includes the query price and c >= 56. Whether a shear-typed supplier can be priced below a rank-one leaf is open.
  • The hub-law replays are gauge-equivalent to a direct sum, so the proof, not the replays, carries that claim.
  • The form-capacity solver cells are numerical generic-solution evidence (numpy pinned); the proof carries the theorem. Landings of down rows at a line after the register reached V exceed the bound, as a control shows, and are out of scope.
  • Invoice-total arithmetic uses typed-in constants, not a recomputation from a word. No word from any pull request is replayed here.
  • Nothing is claimed about the denominator or about kappa.

How to verify. python3.12 -I -B research/p104-surplus-hub-form-note/check.py (about 20 s; prints PASS_P104_SURPLUS_HUB_FORM_NOTE). Registered check: python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/p104-surplus-hub-form-note prints PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE. The interpreter needs numpy==2.4.2.

Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…with hypothesis ledger and exact checks (no kappa)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant