Repository navigation
Conditional κ = .00360410 (+0.245% over #6919): ten more helper splits - #6931
Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
DreamingOfClouds
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 9, 2026 08:51
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Result
Conditional κ = 0.00360410481 (exact crossing 0.0036041048151080064), +0.245% over #6919 (0.0035952826938257874). Package:
research/p104-causal-split-native.What changed against #6919
The word only. Roots, joint caller (byte-identical), per-port root pair, owned-ascent declaration (A6) and the BIT line (#6726) are those of #6919, and the conditional premises are the same.
Checks (all run from the package, all pass)
Exact Fraction replay with both endpoints, strict and relaxed verifiers, both roots with controls, the joint caller chain (78 roles, 18 joint contacts, controls), the invoice recounted twice with #6919, #6917, #6911 and #6833 as controls, interval engines and the 54 + 4 outer ledger, a second replay mod 2^61 − 1 with 126 mutants (0 accepted), the 512-component physical streams, the physical replay of the joint caller, the native chart-change maps (3,185 maps, wrong-phase control), and counted facts on the ten splits with failing controls. One control of #6919 (rewriting a split piece to its parent's label) was vacuous because of a name clash in its code; it is replaced here by a frame-law control, and the README says so.
Not claimed
No second-reader review of the ten splits or of the rewritten event list; no adjoint replay; no streams at tensor width 2 or more; the BIT admission and the compiler are read, not re-derived. Everything conditional in #6919 stays conditional.
Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code