Skip to content

Prove five once-each rank-one frames miss the five-call endpoint. - #7024

Open
unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
unpaidmoon:cursor/five-signed-once-support-7d78
Open

unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
unpaidmoon:cursor/five-signed-once-support-7d78

Conversation

@unpaidmoon

@unpaidmoon unpaidmoon commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change and mathematical scope

Exhaustive finite census: five nonzero symmetric rational rank-one matrices summing to 4I never have all four targets A+P, A+Q, B+P, and B+Q as subset sums. The shortest once-each equation R+S+T+U+V = 4I therefore admits no word in the PR2085/2112 model. One explicit solution on five pairwise nonparallel primitive directions has full parity image F2^2 and is still not a word.

No κ change. The selected frontier stays 781451/250000000. This census does not lower the eight-call minimum. It does not speak about six or more added frames, or about five added frames together with an old call.

Status: exhaustive finite census, which is a scoped proof of support failure for this one equation, plus one witness. Not a heuristic search and not a multiplication theorem.

Remaining obligations: six once-each frames, and five frames plus one old call.

Task and overlap

Base commit: 17469fff78c22941280f04d39dc5a1faee09c840 on upstream CrocSwap/integer-mult-bounds main.

Task: the five-frame open question of merged PR #6952, discussion comment 19507121. Catalogue card bit-new-register-model, scope_status: changed. The same abelian 2-by-2 restriction was already used by #6942 and #6952.

Overlap checked against open upstream PRs, discussion search, and local packages. No open upstream PR states this five-call census. #6952 is the predecessor and is not redone. #6942 and #7013 are three-frame character work and are not redone. Four added frames plus an old call is a different equation.

Scope is changed from the catalogue card. The card asks for a larger or nonabelian alphabet. This package stays in the abelian symmetric 2-by-2 model because that is the declared remainder of #6952. There is no local call-count saving and no selected-frontier change.

Validation

python3 scripts/research_package.py --package research/five-signed-once-support --check-only
python3.12 scripts/research_package.py --package research/five-signed-once-support

Both passed on Python 3.12.3. The registered verifier also passed under python -O. Each command takes about 20 seconds.

The census splits all 116280 ordered 4-tuples of distinct weight-2 and weight-3 subsets into 71040 invertible solutions off the determinant cone, 44520 inconsistent systems, and 720 rank-4 families whose frozen frame is ±2I, ±(A-B), or ±(P-Q). One invertible determinant is reduced by hand to -2. One singular line is checked by direct addition and freezes 2I. The witness directions are (-1,1), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1), and (1,3).

Not run: predecessor replays, Lean, Docker, and the selected-result cold replay. The inherited determinant identity and subset-sum necessity are not reproved.

Credit

Cinna Davis, PR2085/2112 register model. The determinant and subset-sum necessity are PR2910 as recorded by apoursh in PR6190, package research/bit-two-signed-frame-floor. The three-frame character is research/three-signed-old-once. The four-call support proof and this open question are research/four-signed-once-parity, merged as PR #6952, discussion comment 19507121.

Prepared by unpaidmoon with substantial Cursor Grok assistance. No independent human or formal-kernel review. New work is Apache-2.0.

Open next questions

Can six added signed rank-one frames, each used once and with no old call, meet target support for F1+...+F6 = 4I? This is the smallest useful follow-up. A six-call word would still lower the eight-call minimum, and the complement of a four-element subset is a pair, so sizes 2, 3, and 4 all remain. Blocker: the size lemma uses five frames, so the 116280-tuple domain does not carry over.

Can five added frames plus one old call meet support at length 6? First step: fix one old projector E and test R+S+T+U+V = 4I-E. Blocker: every identity in this package uses the residual 4I.

Workflow feedback

The finite list of pair and triple subsets made an exact census possible without a search over directions. A hand-reduced determinant and one explicitly added singular point kept the rational solver anchored.

#1200

The shortest equation R+S+T+U+V=4I has no target-supporting rational rank-one solution: an exhaustive census of the 116280 pair-and-triple tuples, plus one full-parity witness that is not a word. No kappa change.

Co-authored-by: unpaidmoon <unpaidmoon@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants