Repository navigation
Prove no constant insertion makes the valuation-1 e coefficient I - #7039
Open
unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
unpaidmoon wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Beside the stage-0 gate I+x E_11, the pure product stays product_j (I+x_j E_j). The coefficient of e is never I. The coupled31 operator holds only for R=I, and no stage-supported matrix solves either equation. Co-authored-by: unpaidmoon <unpaidmoon@users.noreply.github.com>
This was referenced Nov 10, 2026
Draft
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and mathematical scope
Over F_2, insert one matrix
Rbeside the stage-0 gateI + x E_11in the nine diagonal gates of PR #7027. The scalareis central ande^2 = 0. The pure product remainsproduct_j (I + x_j E_j)for every such insertion.No matrix
Rwith entries inF_2[x, y, z]makes the coefficient ofeequal toI. The obstruction is diagonal: that coefficient'si-th diagonal entry isR_iitimes the corresponding diagonal entry of the pure product, and each of those pure entries is a nonunit.The coupled31 operator
(I + e I)times the pure product is a different equation. For this one slot it holds if and only ifR = I. That is a witness for the operator identity. It is not a T-commuting full-call word, and it does not make the coefficient equal toI.Every one of the 65,536 constant matrices supported on the stage-0 block fails both equations. This is a proof for the polynomial statement and an exhaustive finite census for the stage-supported constant matrices. It is not a truncated search and not a kappa improvement. The selected frontier stays 781451/250000000.
Task and overlap
Base commit:
17469fff78c22941280f04d39dc5a1faee09c840(canonical CrocSwapmain, re-fetched at session start and again before submission; it had not moved). Head:e4ddcd2fde8c46b7e528e8806ab72d9bf7690978on fork branchcursor/paired-star-constant-r-0aa2.Task card:
joint-query-controller, scope refined. The card asks whether a changed query demand removes real work. The actual question is the first open question of PR #7027.Overlap was refreshed at 2026-11-10T10:05:04Z with
python3 scripts/find_overlap.py. The question is open in PR #7027 and in #5593 (comment). The handoff pointer is #1166 (reply in thread). No open PR solves the insertion. The unsplit two-map word, the other-idempotent census, and the g=13 and g=31 gaps were not taken. PR #6956 was not rerun.Validation
Python 3.12, standard library only.
Both the ordinary run and the
-Orun printPASS_PAIRED_STAR_CONSTANT_R_INSERTION, thenPASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEwith outcomenegative-result. Checks raiseSystemExit, so optimized mode does not drop them. The direct command ispython3 -B research/paired-star-constant-r-insertion/verify.py.Checked counts: local coefficient
I_4has 0 hits among 65,536 constant matrices, on either side ofE_11; the local pure target(1 + x) I_4has exactly one hit,R = I_4; the stage-supported embedding has 0 hits for coefficientI_8and 0 hits for the pure product, on either side. All 64 matrix units were multiplied directly. No Lean, Docker, native, or selected-frontier replay was run.Credit
The paired-star contract, the operator
T, and the pure target are from PR #5747 (Ali Romman), including PR #5673, PR #5631, and PR #5617. The T-commuting projector obstruction is PR #6956,research/paired-star-three-full-calls. The valuation-1 triple and the question answered here are PR #7027, head1ba2ac5adfe58fbe9dba34d50d4e5d30633ce3d0. Prepared by unpaidmoon with substantial Cursor Grok assistance. Independent human review and a proof-assistant proof are unclaimed. Apache-2.0.Open next questions
eequal to the pure product? A single gap admits onlyR = Ifor that equation, but two gaps add and the off-diagonal scales depend on the gap. Any finite number of constant insertions already fails to make the coefficient equal toI. The first step is the off-diagonal system for insertions immediately after stage-0E_11and stage-0E_22.Nexhibited in PR Record a valuation-1 factor outside the paired-star T-commutant #7027, does one constant matrix besideI + x Nmake the stage-0 coefficient ofeequal toI, or the eight-dimensional coefficient equal to the pure product? The diagonal identity does not apply. The first step is to expand(I + x N)(I + e R)and multiply by the other two non-idempotent factors.Workflow feedback (optional)
The pinned selected record, rather than the decimal still printed in
current-priorities.md, was the right frontier constant. #1200