Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prove exact coefficient valuations for every minimum-term integer-power support of the fixed tensor generator
D=diag(1,(3+4i)/5). Claim type: scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration, produced by Nick Petalas. This answers the arithmetic-order part of Open next question 2 in merged #5934.For
n=f+1, exponentsm_0<...<m_nand positive integer gapsdelta_s, the primitive Gaussian-integer relation hasThus arbitrary nonconsecutive supports, including Laurent supports and arbitrarily high degree, cannot reduce the quadratic maximum coefficient bit height or cubic explicit coefficient-list storage order at the same
f+2term count. The exact actual-modulus optimum remains open. No new kappa, physical supplier or selected-frontier change is claimed.The new proof, verifier and reproduction guide are isolated under
research/sparse-tensor-annihilator-heights/.Credit Nick Petalas #5934 for the valuation method, consecutive-support theorem and explicit question; zxv #5436 for the fixed-generator tensor escape and coefficient-pricing problem; Anthony Chefles for classical multi-copy independence; and the retained native/control lineage. Vandermonde and Gaussian-integer methods are classical. Predecessor results are cited premises; no predecessor scientific verifier was replayed. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
Evidence
Exact commands from the repository root:
Any CPython 3.12 interpreter can replace the local path. The direct marker is
PASS_SPARSE_TENSOR_ANNIHILATOR_HEIGHTS; the registered runner returnsPASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE. Direct replay writes nothing and requires no Git, sibling package or dependency beyond the standard library.Advance CLAIM. Canonical main was refreshed before submission and remains
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57, priority revision 8. The selected #7000 binding control passed; no selected scientific replay was run. The card's scope change to this arithmetic side result and exact provenance are declared in TASK.json and SOURCES.json.Limitations
The theorem fixes the generator, exact equality, Gaussian-rational coefficient field and minimum term count. It optimizes split-prime valuation mass, not the full complex-modulus objective. More terms, approximate cancellation, other generators and factored or streaming descriptions are outside the claim. It supplies no productive physical consumer, coefficient-generation price, precision, field-pass, ownership/restoration, tape, compiler or outer invoice. The five selected framework assumptions remain. Selected cold replay, predecessor scientific suites, Lean and Docker are unrun and unclaimed. No registered mathematical command was deferred to CI.
Open next questions
Related open work
The refreshed open-PR body corpus contains no other result on this fixed generator's sparse-support coefficient valuations. Related broader tensor-interface work is distinct:
The completion refresh read the eight other open account PRs created since the CLAIM: #7247, #7248, #7249, #7251, #7252, #7253, #7254 and #7255. None studies this fixed generator's coefficient-height or split-prime valuation quantity. The broader tensor relationships are recorded above and below; no additional scientific computations checked another result.
Sparse local-note and unpublished-work coverage remains incomplete; the package records the search limits.
CI notes
CI did not certify this package. At unchanged head
025e0a934635dbcd0e1321dba36decdd96235c9a, run 43023829856, plan job 130533389872, failed inOnboarding helper tests. I read the completed checks once and inspected the job log directly. It reports exactly one failure among 760 tests, with 24 skipped:The assertion at
tests/test_research_current_status.py:58expects the selected reproduction command in the current section ofdocs/ci-verification.md. The logged section still describes #6030 andmake frontier6030-verify. Direct inspection of canonical basee54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57confirms thatcertificates/selected-result.jsoninstead namesmake frontier7000-verify. The test, guide and selected record are byte-identical between that base and this PR. This is a repository-level navigation mismatch.The dependent replay job 130535289845 was skipped, so there is no hosted scientific replay evidence for this package. The local normal/optimized registered checks, source preflight and portable export results above remain the available execution evidence.
I directly verified the same sole failing test, missing-command assertion and 760-test/one-failure/24-skipped totals in all three comparison logs. Each failed step is
Onboarding helper tests:No fix, retrigger commit, push or workflow rerun was made. The repository-level repair remains with maintainers. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way. Blast radius: one isolated six-file research package. No shared source, predecessor evidence or selected-frontier file changes.