Avoid final field modifications in Cucumber and Spock instrumentations by daniel-mohedano · Pull Request #11851 · DataDog/dd-trace-java

daniel-mohedano · 2026-07-03T09:19:48Z

What Does This Do

Introduces a new RetryDescriptorFactory for JUnit5-based framework instrumentations.
- Spock and Cucumber instrumentations register their own retry descriptor generators (by using available constructors) in order to keep the JUnit5 execution instrumentation framework-agnostic while avoiding JEP 500 warnings.

Motivation

#11752 approach to avoid final field modifications in JUnit5 only applied to JupiterTestDescriptor, which is only used by JUnit5. Both Spock and Cucumber implement their own kind of descriptors, which still depended on the non-JEP500-compliant approach to enable execution policies.

Additional Notes

Running an example project on JDK26 with JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=--illegal-final-field-mutation=debug produced the following logs:

Final field testDescriptor in class org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask has been unreflected for mutation...
...
Final field pickle in class io.cucumber.junit.platform.engine.NodeDescriptor$PickleDescriptor has been mutated reflectively...
Final field tags in class io.cucumber.junit.platform.engine.NodeDescriptor$PickleDescriptor has been mutated reflectively...
Final field exclusiveResources in class io.cucumber.junit.platform.engine.NodeDescriptor$PickleDescriptor has been mutated reflectively...
Final field executionMode in class io.cucumber.junit.platform.engine.NodeDescriptor has been mutated reflectively...
Final field uniqueId in class org.junit.platform.engine.support.descriptor.AbstractTestDescriptor has been mutated reflectively...

The build containing the fix doesn't produce the logs.

Contributor Checklist

Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
Add your completed PR to the merge queue by commenting /merge. You can also:
- Customize the commit message associated with the merge with /merge --commit-message "..."
- Remove your PR from the merge queue with /merge -c
- Skip all merge queue checks with /merge -f --reason "reason"; please use this judiciously, as some checks do not run at the PR-level (note: the PR still needs to be mergeable, this will only skip the pre-merge build)
- Get more information in this doc

Jira ticket: SDTEST-3892

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:34:20Z

Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	55.88	54.33	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.55	54.33	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.55	54/214
agentEvpProxy	55.03	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	-

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:36:56Z

Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	37.98	37.15	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.83	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.56	27/105
agentless	38.01	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.59	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.59	27/105
agentlessCodeCoverage	45.26	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.78	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.78	27/105
agentlessLineCoverage	76.18	74.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.36	74.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.36	26/104

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:38:32Z

Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	86.44	87.80	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.36	87.80	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.36	29/117
agentless	80.49	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.56	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.56	30/118
agentlessCodeCoverage	95.52	97.04	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.52	95.12	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.40	29/114
agentlessLineCoverage	112.27	111.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.65	111.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.65	28/113

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:39:04Z

Test Environment - pass4s

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	9.08	10.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.46	10.33	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.25	27/107
agentless	12.43	9.73	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.70	9.73	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.70	27/107
agentlessCodeCoverage	16.18	17.03	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.85	17.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.55	26/105

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:39:54Z

Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	20.40	21.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.25	21.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.25	29/143
agentless	18.44	18.45	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.01	18.82	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.38	30/142
agentlessCodeCoverage	19.34	19.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.65	19.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.65	29/141
agentlessLineCoverage	29.25	29.82	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.57	29.82	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.57	28/140

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:45:35Z

Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	13.03	12.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.41	13.13	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.10	27/108
agentless	12.80	12.37	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.43	12.12	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.68	27/107
agentlessCodeCoverage	15.76	15.11	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.65	15.11	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.65	27/107
agentlessLineCoverage	19.10	18.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.28	18.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.28	26/107

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:48:17Z

Test Environment - jolokia

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	96.30	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +3.07	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +3.07	30/113
agentless	89.56	89.58	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.02	89.58	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.02	28/110
agentlessCodeCoverage	99.22	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.22	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.22	29/109
agentlessLineCoverage	100.24	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.24	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.24	28/108

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T09:54:17Z

Test Environment - okhttp

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	20.23	19.20	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.03	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.64	32/106
agentless	18.69	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.51	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.51	32/106
agentlessCodeCoverage	21.36	22.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.18	22.09	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.73	31/103
agentlessLineCoverage	44.66	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.18	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.18	32/108

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f55771bf7d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-03T09:58:42Z

+          CONSTRUCTOR_7_7, new EmptyConfigurationParameters(), newId, name, source, pickle);
+    }
+    if (CONSTRUCTOR_6_0 != null) {
+      return METHOD_HANDLES.invoke(
+          CONSTRUCTOR_6_0, new EmptyConfigurationParameters(), newId, name, source, pickle);


Preserve Cucumber parameters for retry descriptors

For Cucumber 6.0–7.23, PickleDescriptor derives its execution mode and tag-based exclusive resources from the ConfigurationParameters passed to this constructor (for example, the 7.23 source computes both from parameters: https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-jvm/blob/v7.23.0/cucumber-junit-platform-engine/src/main/java/io/cucumber/junit/platform/engine/NodeDescriptor.java). Passing EmptyConfigurationParameters here means retries for suites that configure non-default feature execution mode or cucumber.execution.exclusive-resources.* are rebuilt with default concurrent mode and no resource locks, while the previous shallow clone preserved those fields; those retries can therefore be scheduled differently from the original scenario.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Seems like the execution mode and exclusive resources are read by the HierarchicalTestExecutorService when planning on how to run a test task. But the retry descriptors are only ever executed by us manually in the execution instrumentation through currentTask.execute() without scheduling, so the fields are never used.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T10:01:31Z

Test Environment - spring_boot

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	16.25	16.36	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.11	16.04	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.21	28/103
agentless	9.67	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.06	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.06	29/104
agentlessCodeCoverage	13.39	13.40	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.01	13.40	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.01	28/102
agentlessLineCoverage	32.43	32.95	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.52	32.30	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.13	27/102

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-03T10:17:59Z

Test Environment - sonar-java

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	0.56	13.94	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -13.38	15.72	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -15.16	30/102
agentless	27.27	24.41	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.86	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +7.68	30/101
agentlessCodeCoverage	88.10	87.80	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.30	89.58	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.48	30/101
agentlessLineCoverage	117.02	144.77	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -27.75	141.90	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -24.88	29/100

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

daniel-mohedano · 2026-07-03T10:33:18Z

/datadog autotest review

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

More details

PR implements JEP 500-compliant descriptor reconstruction for Spock and Cucumber tests by avoiding final field mutations. Code is safe and correct: all null cases handled via defensive MethodHandles patterns, fallback to legacy cloning preserved, registration timing correct, and no behavioral regressions introduced.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit f55771b · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 · 2026-07-10T10:32:50Z

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 69.73% (+12.68%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 4e8269d | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da · 2026-07-10T10:37:54Z

Test Environment - heliboard

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	9.47	9.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.07	9.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.07	15/15

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-07-10T10:38:53Z

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	13.89 s	13.99 s	[-1.5%; +0.1%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	12.85 s	13.07 s	[-2.2%; -1.1%] (significantly better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.02 s	16.83 s	[-0.0%; +2.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	16.92 s	17.10 s	[-1.9%; -0.1%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	16.69 s	16.77 s	[-1.7%; +0.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	17.05 s	16.86 s	[+0.1%; +2.2%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.12 s	15.63 s	[-1.2%; +7.5%] (no difference)

Commit: 4e8269df · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

More details

The retry-descriptor factory dispatch chain (RetryDescriptorFactories → CucumberRetryDescriptorFactory / SpockRetryDescriptorFactory → legacyCopy) is correctly wired. The legacyCopy guard condition (descriptorClone != testDescriptor && !updatedId.equals(...)) correctly prevents modifying the live descriptor on Unsafe failure. The CallDepthThreadLocalMap depth check ensures the ExecutionAdvice does not re-enter itself when the fresh retry NodeTestTask calls execute(). Seven targeted unit tests covering the registry, null-engine guard, overwrite semantics, id-suffix walk, and factory null-return fallback all pass.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{📊 Validated against 7 scenarios · Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit f55771b · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

daniel-mohedano · 2026-07-10T11:10:38Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-07-10T11:10:42Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-07-10 11:10:42 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-07-10 11:10:46 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 2h (p90).

2026-07-10 12:07:30 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

daniel-mohedano added 3 commits June 26, 2026 12:35

feat: avoid final field modifications in junit instrumentation

c73e0a4

fix: cucumber retries running through Suite

70060ee

feat: add retry descriptor factory for junit5-based frameworks

f55771b

daniel-mohedano added type: feature Enhancements and improvements comp: ci visibility Continuous Integration Visibility labels Jul 3, 2026

daniel-mohedano changed the base branch from master to daniel.mohedano/fix-cucumber-retries July 3, 2026 09:22

daniel-mohedano marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2026 09:53

daniel-mohedano requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2026 09:53

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

anmarchenko approved these changes Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Base automatically changed from daniel.mohedano/fix-cucumber-retries to master July 10, 2026 10:13

Merge branch 'master' into daniel.mohedano/jep-500-cucumber-spock

4e8269d

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot reviewed Jul 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 9e673a6 into master Jul 10, 2026
586 checks passed

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the daniel.mohedano/jep-500-cucumber-spock branch July 10, 2026 12:07

github-actions Bot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Conversation

daniel-mohedano commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What Does This Do

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - pass4s

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - jolokia

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Test Environment - okhttp

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot Jul 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

daniel-mohedano Jul 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Environment - spring_boot

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Test Environment - sonar-java

Uh oh!

daniel-mohedano commented Jul 3, 2026

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 • edited by datadog-official Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Test Environment - heliboard

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

daniel-mohedano commented Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

daniel-mohedano commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented Jul 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official Bot

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Jul 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading