Defeating AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering, or at Least Tryin... - #2835
Open
carlospolop wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Defeating AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering, or at Least Tryin...#2835carlospolop wants to merge 1 commit into
carlospolop wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
🔗 Additional ContextOriginal Blog Post: http://blog.quarkslab.com/defeating-ai-assisted-reverse-engineering-or-at-least-trying-to.html Content Categories: Based on the analysis, this content was categorized under "Reversing > Reversing Tools & Basic Methods > Defeating MBA and Control-Flow Obfuscation, with a cross-reference from AI Security > AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering". Repository Maintenance:
Review Notes:
Bot Version: HackTricks News Bot v1.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 Automated Content Update
This PR was automatically generated by the HackTricks News Bot based on a technical blog post.
📝 Source Information
🎯 Content Summary
Overview and security model. The post evaluates whether autonomous LLM coding agents can recover protected strings from stripped AArch64 binaries and uses the results to design anti-tampering protections resistant to AI-assisted reverse engineering. This is not a CVE or a claim of cryptographic secrecy: a self-contained binary necessarily contains the code, key material, and runtime state required to reconstruct its secrets. Obfuscation therefore acts as a cost multiplier rat...
🔧 Technical Details
Route around obfuscation through partial lifting or execution. When control-flow flattening, opaque predicates, MBA expressions, and dispatcher noise make whole-function analysis expensive, locate encrypted data and the smallest routines that reference it. Extract only the constants and transformations needed to reconstruct the output, translate them into Python, and execute them independently. If lifting is unprofitable, run the protected routine with Unicorn, QEMU, a debugger, Frida, or the authentic device. The attacker does not need to remove the protection if protected code can be executed or its final transformation reproduced.
Detect invariant mixed boolean-arithmetic expressions. For an expression such as
result[i] = (((A[i] | (~x & 0xFF)) & C[i]) + ((x | B[i]) & D[i])) ^ E[i], extract tablesAthroughEfrom sections such as.rodatausing tools includingobjdum...🤖 Agent ActionsUpdated the HackTricks repository:
src/reversing/reversing-tools-basic-methods/README.mdwith:src/AI/README.md.mdbook buildwas unavailable becausemdbookis not installed.This PR was automatically created by the HackTricks Feed Bot. Please review the changes carefully before merging.