chore: update npm metadata for packages to be released#135
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 29 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Problem
The package.json metadata was not present for the packages that were going to be released
Solution
Add metadata and engine field foo node in package.json of three packages
Checklist
npm run buildpassesnpm run typecheckpassesnpm run build:catalog:checkpasses (if evaluators or suites changed).env, or.opfor/artifacts committed<type>: <what changed>— e.g.feat: add SSRF evaluatorEvaluator checklist (skip if no evaluator added)
idis unique across all evaluatorspass_criteriaandfail_criteriaare specific, not vagueseveritymatches actual risk (critical= RCE / data breach)standardsmapping is correct.test.yamlfixture included