Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Welcome to paper 🥳 It appears you commit / generate a whole slew of completely unrelated and invalid changes. |
|
I would suggest rebasing this PR or creating a new one |
I don't want to create a new one because this is my first PR and its number is 12345. I will look into rebasing the codes |
8248809 to
338303f
Compare
|
wait. it is not done. I will inform it is ready for review when I end all of rebase procedure |
64bc304 to
597f186
Compare
|
I did it. I am now the master of rebase. I am ready for review. |
|
@lynxplay @electronicboy |
597f186 to
894631f
Compare
|
wait I will reopen PR right now. it was accident |
23aa125 to
7adadc3
Compare
|
I am not sure if I do it right. waiting for review. |
|
THIS IS PULL REQEUST #12345 AND I LOVE IT (soory this might be off topic but i had to say it) |
Strokkur424
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What I find a bit unfortunate is that changing the bonus power in the event basically makes any changes in the offers redundant, as you reroll these anyways.
I don't know if there is a particularly clean way to fix this. I personally can also only think of one way to fix this, but I understand it is not very advantageous:
- The introduction of a new
RetrieveItemEnchantPowerEvent, which allows for setting the enchantment bonus before the offers are even put into consideration.
Therefore, the actual PrepareItemEnchantEvent could stay unmodified and enchantment offer modifications would still work as intended.
Of course, before you make this change, I'd like a Paper developer to confirm that this is an acceptable step to take, because I am not sure myself either.
|
I will fix the build error as soon as possible. |
|
@Strokkur424 your idea is previous my idea. when I discussed this feature at Paper discord's paper-dev channel, I suggest that structure but lynxplay adviced me that, in his opinion, making the event just set value is not good idea (the discord dialog link that starts to discuss this feature with lynxplay: https://discord.com/channels/289587909051416579/555462289851940864/1347917294382219417) So I should change original PrepareItemEnchantEvent. Yeah. I also think it would be good if offers method have more role. and I think "why doesn't it process the values of offers member field at constructor point with considering the bonus value is changed? it would be easy way to handle the logic when making an event." but that is not really feasible. because paper-api package can not import the code from paper-src. (I don't know the principle why it should be like it.) Finally my decision is making bonus member field non final instead of making new event to set the bonus value and to include the other fields of PrepareItemEnchantEvent, checking the value and refreshing the enchantment hint after PrepareItemEnchantEvent calls. (it is now structure.) |
|
Well, we still need some way to modify the new enchantment suggestions, because this is a valid thing a plugin would do:
Not entirely sure how this can be achieved cleanly though. |
|
@Strokkur424 |
|
I am sorry I haven't managed to read through this for so long.
which I still believe to hold true. |
…u after editing bookshelf power
…t of menu after editing bookshelf power" This reverts commit b56273b.
Introduces a new API method that allows plugins to simulate the rolling process of an enchantment table for enchantment offers. This is specifically useful to "reroll" an enchantment tables offers during the PrepareItemEnchantEvent to e.g. change the bookshelf bonus or seed. Co-authored-by: I-am-DDang_ <psychologist3552@gmail.com>
4a66e57 to
bc11611
Compare
…-with-configurable-bookshelf
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
…-with-configurable-bookshelf
…feat-enchantment-hint-with-configurable-bookshelf
No description provided.