Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 42 minutes and 19 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds an ChangesOxlint integration and code fixes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@scripts/cursor-sdk-local-agent-bridge.mjs`:
- Around line 425-427: The loop iterating over the handlers Set at line 425 in
captureActiveClientToolCall() is vulnerable to race conditions because handlers
are being removed concurrently by unregisterCapture() called from the finally
block. Direct Set iteration does not create a snapshot and will skip elements
when mutations occur during traversal. Create a snapshot of the handlers Set
before iteration by changing the for loop from for (const handler of handlers)
to for (const handler of [...handlers]) or for (const handler of
Array.from(handlers)) to safely iterate over a stable copy.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c5df8876-9c9e-4300-bfbc-2187a98151be
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.oxlintrc.jsonpackage.jsonscripts/cursor-sdk-local-agent-bridge.mjsworker/__tests__/index.test.ts
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- worker/tests/index.test.ts
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Tests