Skip to content

Add Claude Code skills for calculator dev + debugging#159

Open
jenbreese wants to merge 12 commits into
devfrom
add-ropv-skill
Open

Add Claude Code skills for calculator dev + debugging#159
jenbreese wants to merge 12 commits into
devfrom
add-ropv-skill

Conversation

@jenbreese

@jenbreese jenbreese commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary
Adds a set of project skills under .claude/skills/ plus CLAUDE.md project guidance. No runtime/app code is touched — this is tooling for working in the repo.

What's included
run-observe-propose-verify — a disciplined debug loop (Run → Observe → Propose → Verify) with an explicit can't-reproduce branch and a verify-fails loop-back, tuned to this repo's manual-verification workflow.
rigorous-accountant — a mathematically rigorous accounting/finance persona for deriving, reviewing, and auditing the calculators' financial math (derive from first principles, cross-check against an amortization schedule, probe boundary cases).
new-calculator — scaffolds a new app/interactives//page.tsx following the established self-contained pattern from the time-value-money reference (typed constants, CONSTRAINTS, FieldError[] validation, string-based inputs, dark-mode tokens, aria).
calculator-qa — a manual QA checklist (boundaries, currency input, validation, dark mode, accessibility, basePath/iframe), since the repo has no automated test suite.
CLAUDE.md — project guidance for Claude Code.
Notes
Skills auto-surface via their description triggers, or can be invoked explicitly (/new-calculator, etc.). They only shape how Claude behaves in-session — they don't add build/deploy automation.
The skills cross-reference each other (e.g. new-calculator and calculator-qa defer to rigorous-accountant for the math).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code

jenbreese and others added 6 commits July 10, 2026 13:02
10 July Release to Production
Fix misleading error message on the Interest Rate tab when no meaningful rate exists
A four-phase change/debug loop tailored to this repo's manual-verification
workflow (no test suite; per-file calculator math).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jenbreese jenbreese changed the title Add ropv skill Add Run, Observe, Propose, Verify debugging skill Jul 16, 2026
… loop-back

Fold in the strongest ideas from a peer's debug-loop skill:
- description now excludes feature/refactor/style-only changes
- Run phase handles the "cannot reproduce" case explicitly
- Propose requires a falsifiable hypothesis
- adds an explicit verify-fails -> re-Observe loop-back with a report gate

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jenbreese
jenbreese requested a review from majimmy88 July 16, 2026 22:15
@jenbreese
jenbreese changed the base branch from 1.x to dev July 16, 2026 22:15
jenbreese and others added 2 commits July 16, 2026 15:36
A mathematically rigorous accounting/finance persona for deriving, reviewing,
and auditing the calculators' financial math: derive from first principles,
cross-check by an independent method (amortization schedule), and probe
boundary cases (zero rate, payment <= interest, high rate, bad input).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- new-calculator: scaffold a calculator following the self-contained TVM
  pattern (typed constants, CONSTRAINTS, FieldError[] validation, string inputs,
  dark-mode tokens, aria).
- calculator-qa: manual QA checklist (boundaries, currency input, validation,
  dark mode, a11y, basePath/iframe) since the repo has no test suite.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jenbreese jenbreese changed the title Add Run, Observe, Propose, Verify debugging skill Add Claude Code skills for calculator dev + debugging Jul 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants