You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The main problem is that it seems too slow, but maybe it's still faster than quadprog for large m. It's also not maintained enough.
cvxpylayers
Not sure we even need cvxpylayers, maybe cvxpy is enough to run CuClarabel. However, it seems that CuClarabel requires Julia, which would be a big new dependency. It also seems slow according to what people say here. But in my opinion it's worth trying: it might be decently fast in our use-case.
Activity
ValerianRey commentedon May 3, 2026
See #664
The main problem is that it seems too slow, but maybe it's still faster than quadprog for large m. It's also not maintained enough.
Not sure we even need cvxpylayers, maybe cvxpy is enough to run CuClarabel. However, it seems that CuClarabel requires Julia, which would be a big new dependency. It also seems slow according to what people say here. But in my opinion it's worth trying: it might be decently fast in our use-case.