docs: fix 'allows to keep' grammar in retainSearchParams

[mrchatam]

Fixes non-idiomatic grammar in the `retainSearchParams` API docs: "allows to keep" → "allows keeping".

Docs-only wording fix.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Clarified the wording describing how the retainSearchParams search middleware keeps search parameters.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 84486b2e-d5ab-4a77-b20e-845d7874c67b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae68535 and af0fbd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/router/api/router/retainSearchParamsFunction.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The retainSearchParams documentation sentence was reworded. No functional or public API changes were made.

Changes

retainSearchParams documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Middleware description wording docs/router/api/router/retainSearchParamsFunction.md	The description now uses “allows keeping search params.”

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to af0fb

No runtime or API behavior changes are introduced.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description accurately explains the docs-only grammar fix, but it omits the required Checklist and Release Impact sections from the repository template.	Add the Checklist section and mark the applicable items. Add the Release Impact section and select the docs/CI/dev-only option.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the documentation grammar fix for retainSearchParams and accurately summarizes the change.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}