ARTEMIS-6142 FollowUp to fix tests - #6629
Conversation
|
Can confirm the LockManagerBackupSyncJournalTest showing this issue. Can also confirm test succeeds with your commit. edit:
edit 2: |
|
@MrEasy so, you think my fix is good with your changes? |
0a62828 to
ad333c7
Compare
|
I'm keeping the best of both worlds here. for a case where this is used on serverLocator.connect() the acceptor will close connections like it used to. while keeping your changes for regular clients. |
ce68296 to
7845cd2
Compare
… close" This reverts commit ded1b54.
Topology discovery on InVM (for collocated stuff, that some tests still use). are using serverLocator.connect(); for those cases I'm keeping the previous semantic on calling close and disconnect. With that we will have the best scenario on each case. keeping the previous semantics for clustering while fixing the regular client usage. assisted by Claude
7845cd2 to
0bb110e
Compare
|
we are doing a release very soon... and I reverted ARTEMIS-6142. Reapplied in this PR with some follow up that will need take place. |
|
Sounds good to me - have to say not much experience with the mechanics in a clustering scenario. |
The purpose I'm sending this PR is basically to open a discussion.
Certain failover tests are now failing with InVM. This is a major concern for Wildfly integratoin as they have a lot of tests doing that.
For reference run LockManagerBackupSyncJournalTest, and you wlil see the faliure without this change on this PR.
@MrEasy / @jbertram