[CELEBORN-2410] Add missing module coverage to labeler.yml - #3789
Open
yew1eb wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
yew1eb
force-pushed
the
CELEBORN-2410-labeler-modules
branch
from
August 8, 2026 10:30
517a14f to
dea1a16
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
labeler.ymldid not match changes underlifecycle-manager/,multipart-uploader/, andrust/— PRs touching only these paths received no module label.lifecycle-manager/**→module:service(daemon wrapper aroundclient.LifecycleManager, packageorg.apache.celeborn.server.lifecyclemanager)multipart-uploader/**→module:service(S3/OSS impls ofserver.common.service.mpu.MultipartUploadHandler, defined in theservicemodule)rust/**→ newmodule:rust(independent Cargo-built Rust client)Why are the changes needed?
These three directories have real source but no labeler entry, so the labeler action silently skips them. Changes to them never get triaged into the correct module label.
Does this PR resolve a correctness bug?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?
YAML syntax validated. Existing module globs unchanged.