Skip to content

chore: sync Java client with Apify OpenAPI spec v2-2026-08-14T072928Z - #15

Open
Pijukatel wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
claude/admiring-brahmagupta-wsv7f1
Open

chore: sync Java client with Apify OpenAPI spec v2-2026-08-14T072928Z#15
Pijukatel wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
claude/admiring-brahmagupta-wsv7f1

Conversation

@Pijukatel

@Pijukatel Pijukatel commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Bumps Version.API_SPEC_VERSION to v2-2026-08-14T072928Z. That spec revision documents the already-implemented Task.isPublic / Task.publicConfig fields and the TaskPublicConfig schema (no new endpoints, no client code change).

Also corrects doc comments that predated this spec version:

  • Task.getIsPublic() and TaskPublicConfig no longer claim to be undocumented.
  • TaskClient.unpublish()'s doc comment (and the matching integration-test comment) no longer claims it needs less permission than publish() - the spec states both require write permission to the task's Actor, which I verified against the reference JS client and the live API.
  • Trimmed two overlong comments (CompressionTest's brotli-fallback-gap rationale, TaskPublicConfig.getInputSchemaFields' restated Javadoc).

CLIENT_VERSION bumped to 0.6.1; also synced stale version strings in README.md (client version and API spec version were two releases behind).

Bump Version.API_SPEC_VERSION for the doc-only spec update that documents the
already-implemented Task.isPublic / Task.publicConfig fields and the
TaskPublicConfig schema (no new endpoints, no client code change).

Correct doc comments that predated this spec version: Task.getIsPublic() and
TaskPublicConfig no longer claim to be undocumented, and
TaskClient.unpublish()'s doc comment (and the matching integration-test
comment) no longer claims it needs less permission than publish() - the spec
states both require write permission to the task's Actor, verified against
the reference JS client and the live API.

Trim two overlong comments (CompressionTest's brotli-fallback-gap rationale,
TaskPublicConfig.getInputSchemaFields' restated Javadoc) to match the coding
rules' conciseness requirement.

Bump CLIENT_VERSION to 0.6.1 and sync the stale version strings in README.md
(client version and API spec version were two releases behind).
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 147th sprint - Tooling team milestone Aug 15, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics. labels Aug 15, 2026
The Task-fields description of getIsPublic() still claimed the field was
"not part of the documented Task schema... but the API returns it in
practice" - the same false claim already corrected elsewhere in this PR,
just missed at this second occurrence. Also note categorization explicitly
as the one undocumented TaskPublicConfig field, for consistency with the
class-level Javadoc fix.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants