docs(payments): document PaymentSetup accommodation/airline fields

[armando-rodriguez-cko]

Summary

Documents the industry.accommodation[]/industry.airline[] shapes and the new fields from the 2026-09-08 spec update in the JSDoc for createAPaymentSetup, updateAPaymentSetup, getAPaymentSetup and confirmAPaymentSetup. This SDK is untyped, so the request body already passes these fields through; only the documentation was missing.

Changes

• src/api/payment-setups/payment-setups.js — documented total_number_of_guests, refundable, delivery_recipient, host (accommodation) and total_number_of_passengers, travel_type, trip_type, refundable, delivery_recipient, ancillaries, insurance (airline)

API Reference

• POST /payments/setups
• PUT /payments/setups/{id}
• GET /payments/setups/{id}
• POST /payments/setups/{id}/confirm/{payment_method_name}

Breaking changes

None. Documentation only.

README

No README changes needed.

[agent-wall-e]

🟢 Risk Classification: LOW

Approval route: AI Auto-Approval
Rollback controls: Automated Instant Rollback + feature flags

Classification reasons

• no_low_class_matched
• prod_source_modified
• 2.2.6_logical_extension:The diff is purely JSDoc comment additions with zero runtime code changes, satisfying all conditions for a documentation-only logical extension.

Operational gates

• ✅ jira_ticket (INT-1696)
• ✅ independent_review

Files analysed: 1

---

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 376219bc71e6…}

[agent-wall-e]

🔬 Debug — why this classification?

Each reason code emitted by the classifier, its source clause in the AI in SDLC Control Framework, and what it means.

Reason code	Kind	Clause	Meaning
no_low_class_matched	informational	§2.2 (fall-through)	None of the deterministic Low classes (§2.2.3, §2.2.4, §2.2.7, docs-only) applied; classifier fell through to LLM evaluation.
prod_source_modified	informational	§2.1 M7 (informational)	At least one file is non-doc, non-test, non-IaC — i.e. application source code was modified.
2.2.6_logical_extension — The diff is purely JSDoc comment additions with zero runtime code changes, satisfying all conditions for a documentation-only logical extension.	classifying	§2.2.6	Sonnet 4.6 evaluator promoted minor → low: the change reuses existing code paths and does not cross a trust boundary.

Kinds:

• classifying — this rule contributed to the chosen tier.
• informational — context only; did not by itself decide the tier.

See issue #3 for the proposal to formalise this map as Appendix A of the standards doc.

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · debug}

[agent-wall-e]

✅ Auto-approved — this PR meets all Low-risk criteria.

All checks passed, no unresolved comments, and the change classification is:

• no_low_class_matched
• prod_source_modified
• 2.2.6_logical_extension:The diff contains only JSDoc comment additions with no code logic, endpoint, auth, data persistence, or behavioral changes whatsoever.

_{wall-e 2026.06.19-02 · policy 376219bc71e6…}