Repository navigation
Spec standalone PostgreSQL for #81 - #101
Open
shipmill-romamo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
shipmill-romamo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
shipmill-romamo[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@romamo Decision needed: do you approve this spec as written? Merging a spec is its approval (the spec gate), so shipmill holds it for your review instead of merging it on green CI.
Reply here with a number or your own answer; shipmill takes this up on the tick after your reply. |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Spec for #81:
docs/specs/006-standalone-postgresql.md, a PostgreSQLServicewith no application Cloudfall deploys.applicationorowner; anownerrole is created by Cloudfall and its password comes from the existing sops secrets store throughpasswordRef(names and a SHA-256 in the record, never the value)remoteAccess(a listen address plus allowed-source CIDRs) maps tohostssllines inpg_hba.confand source-restricted nftables rules; absent means loopback only, and validation refuses it on a server with no firewall or with an open sourcedata copykey on the database name today, so they work unchanged for anownerdatabaseMerging this PR approves the spec.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code