Skip to content

chore: update ai-sdk family patches, effect published pins, and zizmor - #150

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
deps-batch-aug31-ai-sdk-family
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: update ai-sdk family patches, effect published pins, and zizmor#150
ThomasK33 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
deps-batch-aug31-ai-sdk-family

Conversation

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Batch dependency update: ai-sdk family patch releases, effect's published-package pins, and the zizmor toolchain pin.

Bumps

Dependency From To Where
ai ^7.0.85 ^7.0.86 agent/provider/effect (dev), release-please-ai (runtime)
@ai-sdk/harness ^1.0.94 ^1.0.95 sandbox, effect (dev)
@ai-sdk/harness-claude-code ^1.0.98 ^1.0.99 sandbox (dev)
@ai-sdk/react 4.0.88 4.0.89 agent (dev)
@ai-sdk/tui ^1.0.86 ^1.0.87 sandbox (dev)
tsx ^4.23.12 ^4.23.13 all packages (dev)
@coder/ai-sdk-provider 0.4.4 0.4.5 effect (exact pin)
@coder/ai-sdk-sandbox 0.4.7 0.4.8 effect (exact pin)
@ai-sdk/provider 4.0.8 4.0.9 effect (exact pin)
zizmor 1.29.0 1.30.0 mise.toml + mise.lock

Notes:

  • The three effect pins move together: effect consumes the published @coder/ai-sdk-provider / @coder/ai-sdk-sandbox releases (exact pins, not workspace:*), and @coder/ai-sdk-provider@0.4.5 pins @ai-sdk/provider: "4.0.9". Effect's own @ai-sdk/provider pin must track the pin inside the published provider release it consumes, otherwise effect's tree splits across two @ai-sdk/provider copies and breaks type identity (this was a codex P2 finding on chore: update ai-sdk family and zod patches #146). The lockfile resolves a single @ai-sdk/provider@4.0.9 copy.
  • @ai-sdk/react@4.0.89 resolves the same transitive @ai-sdk/mcp@2.0.41 already listed in minimumReleaseAgeExclude — no pnpm-workspace.yaml change needed.
  • zod stays at 4.5.4 (latest, governed by overrides.zod); no peerDependency ranges touched.
  • mise.lock refreshed by mise install: all zizmor platform checksums/URLs moved to 1.30.0; mise no longer emits the redundant url_api lines.
  • GitHub Actions SHA pins checked: actions/checkout v7.0.1, actions/cache v6.1.0, jdx/mise-action v4.3.0, amannn/action-semantic-pull-request v6.1.1 are all already the latest stable releases — no changes.

Validation

  • pnpm check ✅ (oxfmt + oxlint + typecheck)
  • pnpm -r build
  • pnpm -r test
  • pnpm publint
  • pnpm attw
  • zizmor .github/workflows @ 1.30.0 ✅ — "No findings to report" (8 pre-existing suppressions unchanged)
  • Live e2e against dev.coder.com: packages/agent vitest run test/e2e7/7 passed (plain text, stream deltas, client tool round-trip, single-WS multi-tool turn, transport-event trace, file round-trip, file attach+read)

Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5 • Thinking: xhigh

Change-Id: I3a31f5599bf0f69fd31b8ac5cab40c50b07f7754
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-31T21:33:05.884322Z 63cd5e9 Manual request
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-08-31T21:36:48.369305Z 63cd5e9 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ea70971488

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ea70971488

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread packages/effect/package.json
Comment thread packages/effect/package.json
…th new pins

Change-Id: I3da2ee75e99feccb028edaf7fd11aa460113c0ab
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: 63cd5e9fce

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 63cd5e9fce

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 31, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 893e738 Aug 31, 2026
6 checks passed
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 deleted the deps-batch-aug31-ai-sdk-family branch August 31, 2026 21:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant