feat(evals): report review coverage and assessed findings - #76
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e9a1be7eff
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Release conformance passes do not show how many attempts reached independent review or what the findings concerned. Add an offline command,
bun evals/review-report.ts CAMPAIGN [ASSESSMENTS.json], that reads retained evidence and reports those observations separately.The report distinguishes review observed, no review observed, and unassessed attempts; counts verdicts and retries; and leaves findings unclassified unless an attributed assessment names the exact transcript and finding. It rejects changed bytes, mismatched bindings, duplicates, and stale or unmatched assessments. Categories do not affect grading, qualification, or human calibration.
Includes six focused tests, usage documentation, and the audit's separate assessment of the retained inventory gap. The original 8.3.0 campaign reproduces 23 reviewed attempts, 53 with no review observed, 23 passed verdicts, and one failed verdict. The finding is unclassified by default and one evidence gap with the supplied assistant assessment. No paid evals or canaries ran.
Validation: push preflight passed with 1,174 tests passing, one opt-in live smoke skipped, and no failures. Typecheck, lint, release metadata, and build passed.