Skip to content

Skip fp16-config tests on accelerators without fp16 support - #8398

Merged
delock merged 1 commit into
deepspeedai:masterfrom
delock:pr-b-fp16-skip
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

delock merged 1 commit into
deepspeedai:masterfrom
delock:pr-b-fp16-skip

Conversation

@delock

@delock delock commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

TestMultipleModels::test_zero_optimizer, TestSimpleMoE, TestMoE, TestPRMoE, and TestMOETensorParallel hardcode "fp16": {"enabled": True} in their DeepSpeed configs. The engine's sanity check then raises:

ValueError: Type fp16 is not supported on your device.

on any accelerator whose is_fp16_supported() is false. On CPU that maps to the AVX512-FP16 capability of the host, and GitHub's ubuntu-24.04 runners are hardware-heterogeneous: the same test passes on one runner and fails on the next (observed directly in #8381 — 146 failures appeared on one runner generation and none on another, with identical code).

Change

Skip these tests via a capability query:

@pytest.mark.skipif(not get_accelerator().is_fp16_supported(), reason="fp16 is not supported on this accelerator")
  • capability only, no accelerator-name matching;
  • mirrors the existing bf16 skip precedent in tests/unit/v1/zero/test_zero_user_backward.py;
  • deliberately a skip rather than silently running bf16 — these tests exist to cover the fp16 paths.

Validation

Validated as part of the multi-rank CPU CI experiment in #8381: the 146 hardware-lottery failures became deterministic skips, zero regressions on previously-passing tests.

test_multiple_models/test_zero_optimizer and the MoE tests hardcode
"fp16": {"enabled": True} in their DeepSpeed configs. The engine's
sanity check then raises "Type fp16 is not supported on your device"
on any accelerator whose is_fp16_supported() is false - on CPU that
depends on the host's AVX512-FP16 capability, and GitHub's ubuntu-24.04
runners are heterogeneous enough that the same test passes on one
runner and fails on the next.

Skip these tests via a capability query instead of depending on runner
hardware, mirroring the existing bf16 skip precedent in
test_zero_user_backward.

Validated as part of the multi-rank CPU experiment in deepspeedai#8381: 146
failures of this class became deterministic skips, zero regressions.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 31e794e4ed

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

import deepspeed
import deepspeed.comm as dist
import torch
from deepspeed import get_accelerator

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Add the required Signed-off-by trailer

This is a non-merge commit, but its message has no Signed-off-by trailer. Add the author name and email from the Git configuration using git commit --signoff so the commit satisfies the repository's mandatory DCO/CI requirement.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L8-L8

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@delock
delock added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2026
Merged via the queue into deepspeedai:master with commit 493dafa Sep 3, 2026
12 of 15 checks passed
@delock
delock deleted the pr-b-fp16-skip branch September 3, 2026 10:26
banxingmjj pushed a commit to openanolis/DeepSpeed that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2026
…epspeedai#8407)

## Description

`train_cifar` unconditionally passed
`devices=[get_accelerator().current_device_name()]` to `fork_rng`. On
CPU that becomes `devices=['cpu']`, and `torch.cpu` has no
`get_rng_state`, so the context manager raises `AttributeError` before
the test body starts — the CPU RNG lives in the global generator that
`fork_rng` already forks.

Probe the device module for a per-device RNG instead of matching
accelerator names:

- backends whose device module has `get_rng_state` (e.g. cuda) behave
exactly as before;
- backends without one (cpu) pass `devices=[]`, which changes nothing
beyond the global-RNG save/restore `fork_rng` always performs.

The crash is only reachable from the multi-rank tests that call
`train_cifar` (`test_onebit.py`, `test_pipe.py`), which the CPU runner
currently skips at the device gate; it was exposed by the `LOCAL_SIZE=4`
experiment in deepspeedai#8381. Sibling fixes from the same series landed as deepspeedai#8397,
deepspeedai#8398 and deepspeedai#8399.

## Test plan

- pre-commit (yapf / flake8 / check-torchdist / codespell) passes on the
changed file;
- exercised under the `LOCAL_SIZE=4` multi-rank CPU run tracked in
deepspeedai#8381: the `test_onebit` / `test_pipe` callers got past `fork_rng` and
into their test bodies with this exact change.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
banxingmjj pushed a commit to openanolis/DeepSpeed that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2026
…peedai#8409)

## Description

The dynamic offload-state tests assert strict allocated-memory deltas
around `offload_states()` / `reload_states()`:

- `alloc_after_offload < alloc_before_offload`
- `alloc_after_reload > alloc_after_offload`

That contract assumes `memory_allocated()` is allocator bookkeeping,
which holds on cuda (`torch.cuda.memory_allocated()`). On cpu,
`CPU_Accelerator.memory_allocated()` reports process RSS (psutil), and
RSS does not shrink when tensors are freed — so all 92 parameterized
cases fail even when the offload itself is correct (the device-placement
and data-integrity checks in the same tests pass).

Gate only the memory-delta asserts on whether the accelerator's torch
device module exposes `memory_allocated` (cuda does; `torch.cpu` does
not), mirroring the capability probe used for `fork_rng` in
`train_cifar` (deepspeedai#8407):

- cuda and other allocator-backed backends: behavior unchanged
- cpu: the unobservable deltas are skipped; all device-placement
validations still run

Exposed by the `LOCAL_SIZE=4` multi-rank CPU run in deepspeedai#8381 (92 of the 131
v1-half failures there).

## Validation (executed on real hardware)

- 20-core x86_64 CPU, torch 2.13.0+cpu, gloo backend, 2 ranks
(`LOCAL_SIZE=2`)
- Before:
`TestDynamicOffloadStatesZero12[False-1-False-False-optim_states]` fails
on the persistent-state delta assert
- After: 5 representative cases pass (persistent and grad paths, ZeRO
stage 1/2/3, `static_offload_optimizer=True` branch) — 5 passed in 55.6s
- pre-commit (yapf / flake8 / check-torchdist / codespell) passes on the
changed file

Sibling PRs from the same series: deepspeedai#8397, deepspeedai#8398, deepspeedai#8399, deepspeedai#8407.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
pull Bot pushed a commit to QSLee-Net/DeepSpeed that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2026
…pspeedai#8559)

## Description

`bf16_required_version_check()` (`tests/unit/util.py`) requires torch >=
1.10, **CUDA >= 11.0 and NCCL >= 2.10.3**. On the cpu accelerator, bf16
collectives run over gloo/ccl and none of those transport dependencies
exist, so the check always returns False and **every bf16 test is
skipped — about 40 call sites across 15 files**. `test_zero_autocast.py`
is worse off: it **raises** instead of skipping, so each of its cases
counts as a failure (24 on the multi-rank CPU run in deepspeedai#8381).

This PR scopes the version floors inside the check itself:

```python
if (cpu_accelerator and accelerator_pass) or (torch_version_available and cuda_version_available
                                              and nccl_version_available and accelerator_pass):
    return True
```

- **cpu**: only the accelerator's own bf16 support
(`is_bf16_supported()`) is required — the torch/CUDA/NCCL floors are
transport dependencies that gloo/ccl does not have
- **every other accelerator** (cuda, npu, hpu, xpu, mlu, ...): evaluates
the exact original floors; `cpu_accelerator` is False so the expression
is bit-identical to before, and the npu/hpu/xpu exemption branches are
untouched
- `test_zero_autocast.py`: the bf16 gate goes back to the bare call
every other caller uses, and skips instead of raising

The hardcoded `init_distributed(dist_backend='nccl')` in the same test
is deliberately left alone: it is a no-op (the harness already
initialized the process group, `comm.py:838-839`), and deriving the
backend per accelerator would change behavior on non-cuda accelerators
(npu/hpu resolve to hccl etc.). The baseline `DDP(device_ids=[i])`
pinning is left for a follow-up (deepspeedai#8399 fixed the same pattern
elsewhere).

## Validation (executed on real hardware)

- 20-core x86_64 CPU, torch 2.13.0+cpu, gloo backend
- Direct call: `bf16_required_version_check()` on cpu returns `False`
before, `True` after. Note: `CPU_Accelerator.is_bf16_supported()` is
currently a stub that always returns True, so the cpu path does not gate
on the hardware's bf16 instructions — giving it a real capability probe
is left as a follow-up
- Non-cpu equivalence: with `cpu_accelerator == False` the new
expression reduces exactly to the original `A and C and N and P`
- pre-commit (yapf / flake8 / check-torchdist / codespell) passes on
both changed files

Sibling PRs from the same series: deepspeedai#8397, deepspeedai#8398, deepspeedai#8399, deepspeedai#8407, deepspeedai#8409.
Exposed by the `LOCAL_SIZE=4` multi-rank CPU run in deepspeedai#8381.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
delock added a commit to delock/DeepSpeedSYCLSupport that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2026
The baseline DistributedFixture builds an fp16 engine config for every
dtype=float16 parametrization, and deepspeed.initialize's sanity check
raises "Type fp16 is not supported on your device." on accelerators
without fp16 support. Because the failure happens inside the fixture's
distributed run, pytest reports a setup ERROR for every dependent test
(48 on the multi-rank CPU run) instead of a skip.

Skip inside the fixture like deepspeedai#8398 did for the fp16-config tests;
DistributedFixture propagates the skip to all dependent tests. Devices
with fp16 support are unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
delock added a commit to delock/DeepSpeedSYCLSupport that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2026
TestCoalesceFP16 forces an fp16 config, and deepspeed.initialize's
sanity check raises "Type fp16 is not supported on your device." on
accelerators without fp16 support — the same hardware lottery deepspeedai#8398
handled for the other fp16-config tests. Add the same class-level
skipif so the gap is a skip, not three failures.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
delock added a commit to delock/DeepSpeedSYCLSupport that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2026
The dtype=float16 parametrizations of TestNoSyncCtxt crash
deepspeed.initialize's sanity check ("Type fp16 is not supported on
your device.") on accelerators without fp16 support — the same
hardware lottery deepspeedai#8398 handled elsewhere. Guard the three
dtype-parametrized methods so the gap is a skip, not eight failures;
stages 2/3 additionally never reach their expected no_sync
AssertionError on such hosts.

Verified locally on an fp16-incapable CPU: 8 fail -> 8 skip, all 17
remaining parametrizations pass.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
delock added a commit to delock/DeepSpeedSYCLSupport that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
TestMoECheckpoint hardcodes fp16 configs, so deepspeed.initialize's
sanity check fails on accelerators without fp16 support — the same
hardware lottery deepspeedai#8398 handled elsewhere. Add the class-level skipif.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
delock added a commit to delock/DeepSpeedSYCLSupport that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2026
TestZeroPartialOffloadConfigSweep hardcodes fp16 and
test_checkpoint_pipe_engine enables it for zero_stage > 0; both trip
initialize's sanity check on accelerators without fp16 support (deepspeedai#8398's
hardware lottery). Skip those parametrizations so the gap is a skip.

With this, every fp16-config test in the suite guards on
is_fp16_supported().

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
yermakoffivan pushed a commit to yermakoffivan/deepspeed that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2026
…dai#8684)

## Description

Every fp16-config test that reaches `deepspeed.initialize` crashes its
sanity check (`Type fp16 is not supported on your device.`) on
accelerators whose `is_fp16_supported()` is false. On CPU that maps to
the AVX512-FP16 capability of the host, and GitHub's `ubuntu-24.04`
runners are hardware-heterogeneous, so these tests flip between failure
and skip depending on which runner they land on. deepspeedai#8398 added the first
skipifs; the multi-rank CPU run in deepspeedai#8381 flushed out six more files:

| File | Shape of the gap |
|---|---|
| `checkpoint/test_universal_checkpoint.py` | fp16 parametrizations fail
**inside the baseline DistributedFixture's distributed run** — pytest
reports a setup **ERROR** for every dependent test (48 on the multi-rank
run) instead of a skip |
| `v1/zero/test_zero_coalesce_grad_reduction.py` | `TestCoalesceFP16`
forces an fp16 config |
| `runtime/test_no_sync_ctxt.py` | dtype=float16 parametrizations of
three methods; stages 2/3 additionally never reach their expected
no_sync AssertionError on such hosts |
| `checkpoint/test_moe_checkpoint.py` | whole class hardcodes fp16 |
| `runtime/zero/test_zero_offloadpp.py` |
`TestZeroPartialOffloadConfigSweep` hardcodes fp16 |
| `checkpoint/test_pipeline.py` | fp16 enabled for zero_stage > 0; only
that parametrization skips, zero_stage=0 keeps running |

With this PR, **every fp16-config test in the suite guards on
`is_fp16_supported()`** — the capability gap is a skip, not a failure,
on any accelerator.

## Validation (executed on real hardware)

- 20-core x86_64 CPU without AVX512-FP16, gloo, 2-4 ranks
(`LOCAL_SIZE=2/4`)
- Before: 18 failures + 48 setup ERRORs across these files on the
multi-rank CPU run
- After: every affected parametrization skips; adjacent non-fp16
parametrizations keep passing (e.g. pipeline zero_stage=0 runs to
completion)
- Full-suite evidence in deepspeedai#8381: the multi-rank CPU run went 8 failures
-> 0 with these guards

Sibling PRs from the same series: deepspeedai#8397, deepspeedai#8398, deepspeedai#8399, deepspeedai#8407, deepspeedai#8409,
deepspeedai#8559, deepspeedai#8648.

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
meefs pushed a commit to meefs/DeepSpeed that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2026
…es (deepspeedai#8702)

## Description

Two latent bugs in Ulysses SP, both backend-independent (neither is
CPU-specific — the CPU/gloo multi-rank run in deepspeedai#8381 is simply what
surfaced them), plus test adaptations so the file can also run on
non-CUDA accelerators.

### 1. `register_with_transformers` rejected every string model path

`deepspeed/runtime/sequence_parallel/ulysses_sp.py` compared
`core_attn_implementation` against the config's `_attn_implementation`
even when the caller passed a **model path string**:

```python
hf_model_config = AutoConfig.from_pretrained(model_name_or_path)   # string branch
model_attn_implementation = getattr(hf_model_config, "_attn_implementation", None)
if model_attn_implementation is not None and model_attn_implementation != core_attn_implementation:
    raise ValueError(...)
```

In transformers, `_attn_implementation` is a **property resolved at
model load time** — `from_pretrained` resolves which implementation the
runtime can actually use and writes it back to the config. A bare
`AutoConfig` never goes through that resolution, so the property returns
its fallback value for "unresolved":

```
AutoConfig.from_pretrained(path)._attn_implementation      -> eager   (fallback, not a choice)
AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(path).config._attn... -> sdpa    (resolved)
```

So every string-path caller asking for `sdpa`/`flex_attention`/FA2 was
rejected with a spurious mismatch against `'eager'`. The check is only
meaningful for a config that was resolved, i.e. when the caller handed
us a constructed model (or a PEFT wrapper exposing `.config`); scope it
to that case. The comparison expression itself is unchanged, and
`TestUlyssesSPHFAttnImplMismatch` (which passes a model object) still
raises as intended.

### 2. `UlyssesSPDataLoaderAdapter` used a 0-dim tensor in `all_gather`

```python
seqlen = torch.tensor(n, ...)                    # 0-dim
seqlens = [torch.zeros(1, ...) for _ in range(sp_world_size)]   # shape (1,)
dist.all_gather(seqlens, seqlen, group=self.sp_group)
```

`c10d.all_gather` requires each receive tensor to have the same size as
the send tensor. NCCL moves flattened bytes and tolerates the mismatch;
gloo validates shapes and rejects it (`ProcessGroupGloo::allgather:
invalid tensor size at index 0 (expected (), got (1))`). Send a
1-element tensor to match.

### 3. Tests

- `TestUlyssesSPHFFlexAttention` needs the CUDA flex kernel -> skip on
non-CUDA accelerators (same guard idiom as `tests/unit/util.py`, the
nvme/triton CUDA-only tests).
- `TestUlyssesSPHFPEFT`: the mock attached a **bare** `AutoConfig`,
whose `_attn_implementation` is the unresolved `'eager'` — so this test
failed on every backend, not just CPU. Give the mock the load-resolved
value a real PEFT wrapper carries (the sibling
`TestUlyssesSPHFAttnImplMismatch` in the same file already sets it the
same way).
- `TestUlyssesSPHFDisableInEval` pinned its tensors/models to
`cuda:<rank>` although it runs sdpa and nothing in it is CUDA-specific.
Use `get_accelerator().current_device_name()` like the rest of the file
(on CUDA that is exactly `cuda:<rank>`, since the test harness sets the
device per rank in `tests/unit/common.py`), so the test runs on any
backend instead of erroring.

## Validation

Hardware: 20-core x86_64 CPU without AVX512-FP16, gloo backend, 2 ranks
(`LOCAL_SIZE=2`), transformers 4.51.3, torch 2.13.

- `tests/unit/ulysses_alst/test_ulysses_sp_hf.py`: **5 passed, 2
skipped** (flex skipped by the new guard). The sdpa classes pass end to
end including their numerical-parity assertions; before the fix they
died at registration.
- `TestUlyssesSPHFDisableInEval` now actually **executes** on CPU rather
than being skipped.
- `TestUlyssesSPHFAttnImplMismatch` still raises the expected
`ValueError` (the mismatch check is preserved where a resolved config
exists).
- Full multi-rank CPU CI in deepspeedai#8381: this file went from 5 failures to 0,
with the overall job green.

(`TestUlyssesSPHFHubKernel` is not exercised by the version pin above —
it needs the `lazy_import_flash_attention` API from a newer
transformers; it passes in CI, which installs transformers from git
main.)

Sibling PRs from the same series: deepspeedai#8397, deepspeedai#8398, deepspeedai#8399, deepspeedai#8407, deepspeedai#8409,
deepspeedai#8559, deepspeedai#8648, deepspeedai#8684.

---------

Signed-off-by: Guokai Ma <guokai.ma@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: pengdurice <pengduhit@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants