docs: revise safety status of requirements

[a-zw]

📌 Description

Derived from the tool verification report, we now know what aspects of the tool are safety-relevant and which are not.

🚨 Impact Analysis

• This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
• This change does not violate any design decisions
• Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

• Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
• Added/updated tests to cover the changes
• Followed project coding standards and guidelines

[github-actions]

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: f5d251f4-4110-4113-b190-bcecbda71b29
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//src:license-check': no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
ERROR: no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 6.014s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

[github-actions]

Documentation preview for this pull request is available at:
pr-736: https://eclipse-score.github.io/docs-as-code/pr-736/

[AlexanderLanin]

discussed in call: ask process experts how to derive safety status from tool classification

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

@a-zw can you argument for the tool_reqs why they should be QM now? As they were all ASIL_B before so if we downgrade them we need to argument this.

@PandaeDo @aschemmel-tech please review this if you have time <3

[PandaeDo]

Would not agree on some classifications. You can check against the process requirements https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/main/process_areas/safety_analysis/safety_analysis_workproducts.html. If they comply to ISO 26262 I would rate them as ASIL B. In case that they are only comply to ASPICE I would rate them as QM.