Skip to content

Experiment with lazy loading #3199

Closed

Description

@stefannibrasil

To make users only pay for what they use, ultimately avoiding loading all generators by default, we need to experiment with lazy loading the generators.

This issue is to assess how much work it would be to implement lazy loading, compare benchmarks and the pros and cons of maintainability, fewer breaking changes, easier adoption factors as guiding points.

Activity

  1. added 6 commits that reference this issue on Feb 10, 2026
    f951a8a
    95585e9
    d3d26a7
    94a6eac
    0aa9342
    f88650e
  2. stefannibrasil commented on Feb 10, 2026

    @stefannibrasil
    ContributorAuthor

    The findings have been documented in #3205

  3. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions