Skip to content

Order arm64 builds first in SDK archive - #13713

Open
parlough wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
misc/order-arm64-first
Open

Order arm64 builds first in SDK archive#13713
parlough wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
misc/order-arm64-first

Conversation

@parlough

@parlough parlough commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In the SDK archive, order arm64 builds before x64 builds within each release. This only affects macOS currently and helps promote arm64 builds over x64 builds on the road to their deprecation.

Staged: https://flutter-docs-prod--docs-pr13713-misc-order-arm64-first-3ovtrcs6.web.app/install/archive#stable-channel

@parlough
parlough requested review from a team and sfshaza2 as code owners August 12, 2026 01:06
@parlough
parlough requested a review from vashworth August 12, 2026 01:07

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the release fetching logic in archive_table.dart to group releases by version and sort them by architecture. The review feedback correctly points out that relying on alphabetical sorting to place 'arm64' first is fragile, and suggests using a priority-based sorting approach instead to ensure robustness.

Comment thread sites/docs/lib/src/components/pages/archive_table.dart
@flutter-website-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Staged preview of the updated docs.flutter.dev site (updated for commit 27a5331):

https://flutter-docs-prod--docs-pr13713-misc-order-arm64-first-3ovtrcs6.web.app

@flutter-website-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Staged preview of the updated flutter.dev site (updated for commit 27a5331):

https://flutter-dev-230821--www-pr13713-misc-order-arm64-first-ibq0jygu.web.app

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants