[kikoso]

The build and the sample app still carry the names from when this was an internal Robolectric prototype:

• rootProject.name: AndroidMapsRobolectric -> android-maps-testing (matches the repo).
• Sample app package, namespace and applicationId: com.example.androidmapsrobolectric -> com.google.maps.android.testing.sample.
• Sample theme and app name: AndroidMapsRobolectricTheme / Theme.AndroidMapsRobolectric / "AndroidMapsRobolectric" -> MapsTestingSampleTheme / Theme.MapsTestingSample / "Maps Testing Sample".
• Skill and reference links that point into the sample sources now use the new paths. Line numbers are unchanged, and I checked every #Lx-Ly region link against its [START]/[END] tags.

Only :app changes. No published artifact, package or API is affected. The three library modules still use their current packages, and moving robolectric-testing from com.google.maps.android.robolectric to ...testing.robolectric is left for a separate decision, since rc01 is already on Maven Central.

The skill templates keep their com.example.maptest.templates placeholder package on purpose.

One thing to check: the instrumentation job builds the sample with ACTIONS_API_KEY. If that key has an Android application restriction tied to com.example.androidmapsrobolectric, the map will not render under the new applicationId. The emulator run on this PR will show it either way.

Conflicts with #7: both touch VisualMapSampleTest.kt and its skill links. Whichever merges second needs a rebase; it is mechanical.

Ran ./gradlew test lint spotlessCheck apiCheck docs:dokkaGenerate assembleDebug: all green.

[snippet-bot]

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 19 region tags.

• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:184, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:291, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:409, tag maps_robolectric_java_demo_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:623, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/ai_visual_testing_and_gemini.md:159, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/modular_architecture_and_anti_bloat.md:98, tag maps_robolectric_manager
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/modular_architecture_and_anti_bloat.md:234, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/robolectric_shadows_and_jvm_testing.md:38, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/robolectric_shadows_and_jvm_testing.md:337, tag maps_robolectric_java_demo_test
• .agents/skills/maps-robolectric-testing/SKILL.md:54, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• .agents/skills/maps-robolectric-testing/SKILL.md:159, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test
• .agents/skills/maps-visual-testing/SKILL.md:52, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• app/src/androidTest/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/VisualMapSampleTest.kt:28, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• app/src/main/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/manager/StoreLocatorMapManager.kt:31, tag maps_robolectric_manager
• app/src/test/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/MapDemoTest.kt:36, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• app/src/test/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/MapViewDemoTest.java:86, tag maps_robolectric_java_demo_test
• app/src/test/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/MapViewDemoTest.java:154, tag maps_robolectric_java_comprehensive_test
• app/src/test/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/manager/StoreLocatorLazyAssertComparisonTest.kt:60, tag maps_robolectric_lazy_store_locator_comparison
• app/src/test/java/com/google/maps/android/testing/sample/manager/StoreLocatorMapManagerTest.kt:37, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test

You are about to delete 19 region tags.

• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:184, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:291, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:409, tag maps_robolectric_java_demo_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/SKILL.md:623, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/ai_visual_testing_and_gemini.md:159, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/modular_architecture_and_anti_bloat.md:98, tag maps_robolectric_manager
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/modular_architecture_and_anti_bloat.md:234, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/robolectric_shadows_and_jvm_testing.md:38, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• .agents/skills/android-maps-testing/references/robolectric_shadows_and_jvm_testing.md:337, tag maps_robolectric_java_demo_test
• .agents/skills/maps-robolectric-testing/SKILL.md:54, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• .agents/skills/maps-robolectric-testing/SKILL.md:159, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test
• .agents/skills/maps-visual-testing/SKILL.md:52, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• app/src/androidTest/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/VisualMapSampleTest.kt:28, tag maps_visual_test_sample
• app/src/main/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/manager/StoreLocatorMapManager.kt:31, tag maps_robolectric_manager
• app/src/test/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/MapDemoTest.kt:36, tag maps_robolectric_demo_test
• app/src/test/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/MapViewDemoTest.java:86, tag maps_robolectric_java_demo_test
• app/src/test/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/MapViewDemoTest.java:154, tag maps_robolectric_java_comprehensive_test
• app/src/test/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/manager/StoreLocatorLazyAssertComparisonTest.kt:60, tag maps_robolectric_lazy_store_locator_comparison
• app/src/test/java/com/example/androidmapsrobolectric/manager/StoreLocatorMapManagerTest.kt:37, tag maps_robolectric_manager_test

---

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

• Refresh this comment

[github-actions]

Coverage (unit tests)

No unit baseline recorded in coverage/history.csv yet, so this run only reports absolute numbers.

Module	Line %	Change	Branch %	Change
golden-testing	90.42%	new	58.00%	new
robolectric-testing	84.06%	new	51.87%	new
visual-testing	36.54%	new	25.07%	new
TOTAL	78.88%	new	44.10%	new

_{Line and branch coverage from unit test reports. History is recorded in coverage/history.csv after each merge to main.}