Poor performance when updating thousands of data

[risalfajar]

Explain the Problem in Detail

I have thousands of items that I want to update.
Currently, there's only updateDocument() API available, which only updates a single data. Since Apps Script doesn't support parallelization (CMIIW), our only option is to call updateDocument() multiple times synchronously, which is very bad for performance.

Do you have any solution/workaround for this?

Library Version: 33

[abkarino]

You would need to use a batchWrite operation which would encapsulate up to 500 writes.
However, this feature is not available in this repo yet. There is a Pull Request already open for that.

[Michael-Ackerman3956]

when is the batchWrite function coming along? I am also having the same problem. I need to run hundreds of the app script function...

[abkarino]

I have no clue.
#144
I was just checking if there has been any updates recently in this repo.

[Michael-Ackerman3956]

Just posted my issue in SO - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77289105/create-or-update-firestore-collection-based-on-google-app-script

[abkarino]

I already have that feature deployed on my fork, you can use it from there or you can do a new fork and deploy it to your own script.

[risalfajar]

I don't think this library is still maintained, the last release is three years ago.

@grahamearley would you confirm on this?

[Michael-Ackerman3956]

I already have that feature deployed on my fork, you can use it from there or you can do a new fork and deploy it to your own script.

Installed your V4 library and it works like a charm :)

[LaughDonor]

I don't think this library is still maintained, the last release is three years ago.

@grahamearley would you confirm on this?

I apologize on the lack of maintenance. I have scheduled time to work on this within the coming week to address and catch up to all the issues. I'm aware of @abkarino's changes and should be incorporating them into a release as well. Thanks for your patience! :)

[risalfajar]

@LaughDonor It has been almost 1 year, do you have any problem?

[Michael-Ackerman3956]

Any updates on this? I am now importing @abkarino 's batch function again, which works well.

[ywc8891]

Any updates on this? I am now importing @abkarino 's batch function again, which works well.

The script cannot be accessed since last week. @abkarino

[Michael-Ackerman3956]

@grahamearley @LaughDonor The batch function library is not accessible, although we were able to download the files to local. Would there be any update to merge this major "batch update" functions into the existing library??

@abkarino Any issues at your repo? I downloaded it to local, but the library doesn't work anymore. Looking forward for resolution :))

Anyway, I worked around it by forking @abkarino 's repo and creating my own local library. But I hope to use the main version in future as my implementations are rather crude and I am not very good at JS/TS.

[abkarino]

I am terribly sorry for the broken library on my end.
I made a mistake back then and the code was deployed under the company Google domain and I couldn't migrate it to personal. I didn't want to change the id for existing users but I left the company and they might have limited the access to that library.
I can communicate with them or reupload this time to my personal account tomorrow.
I developed it for the company use but released to the public hoping it would have been to the repo.
I also wanted to add support for transactions but I didn't do that as the repo hasn't been maintained for over a year or more.

[Michael-Ackerman3956]

@abkarino To be honest, I have been using your repo to a great use and it is a huge time savor, esp when my forte is not in java/google app script. I was able to workaround by forking your repo and creating my own app script library.

But I would love to use your personal account version, if it would be maintained and improved further. Also, thank you for being a good owner and maintaining it.