Skip to content

Update GitHub Action aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials to v6 - #9135

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/gha/aws-actions-configure-aws-credentials-6.x
Open

Update GitHub Action aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials to v6#9135
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/gha/aws-actions-configure-aws-credentials-6.x

Conversation

@hash-worker

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials action major v4.3.1 → v6.2.3

Release Notes

aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials (aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials)

v6.2.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.2.2

Compare Source

Miscellaneous Chores

v6.2.2

Compare Source

Miscellaneous Chores

v6.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.2.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes

v6.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: allow kubelet token symlink in #​1805

v6.1.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.1.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v6...v6.1.1

v6.1.0

Compare Source

Features

v6.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • Update action to use node24 Note this requires GitHub action runner version v2.327.1 or later (#​1632) (a7a2c11)
Features
Bug Fixes
  • properly output aws-account-id and authenticated-arn when using role-chaining (#​1633) (7ceaf96)

v6

Compare Source

v5.1.1

Compare Source

Miscellaneous Chores
  • release 5.1.1 (56d6a58)
  • various dependency updates

v5.1.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes

v5.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • Cleanup input handling. Changes invalid boolean input behavior (see #​1445)
Features

v5

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 2am on saturday"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@hash-worker
hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge August 1, 2026 00:55
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview Aug 5, 2026 7:23pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview Aug 5, 2026 7:23pm
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview Aug 5, 2026 7:23pm

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches OIDC credential setup on the main deploy path (ECR push and ECS redeploy); behavior should stay the same given unchanged inputs, but a major action upgrade warrants watching the next main deploy runs.

Overview
Upgrades aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials from v4.3.1 to v6.2.3 in .github/workflows/deploy.yml at all three OIDC assume-role steps: build (ECR push), stage (ECR :staging), and deploy (ECS). Each step still uses the same role-to-assume and aws-region; only the action pin changes.

v6 is a major bump (Node 24 runtime on the action). This workflow already runs on ubuntu-24.04, which satisfies the runner version requirement for v6.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9ef4ac4. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Aug 1, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.57%. Comparing base (ac5ec9c) to head (9ef4ac4).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9135   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.57%   59.57%           
=======================================
  Files        1413     1413           
  Lines      138053   138053           
  Branches     6510     6510           
=======================================
+ Hits        82240    82241    +1     
+ Misses      54771    54770    -1     
  Partials     1042     1042
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 12.56% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 12.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.21% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 7.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings 91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 29.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 42.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Comparing deps/gha/aws-actions-configure-aws-credentials-6.x (9ef4ac4) with main (2d99645)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (b13818b) during the generation of this report, so 2d99645 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@hash-worker
hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/gha/aws-actions-configure-aws-credentials-6.x branch from 118bbad to 9ef4ac4 Compare August 5, 2026 19:09
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.807 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.455 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$49.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$34.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.407 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$251 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.571 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.309 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 583 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$72.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$80.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 544 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$86.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 528 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$70.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 402 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$61.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$61.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 681 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$18.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$550 \mathrm{ms} \pm 941 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@indietyp @TimDiekmann