Repository navigation
docs: operationalize complex-build authoring routes - #124
Conversation
|
Review of head 1. Do not require raw OBJ byte identity for every producer
That is stronger than our own #114/#119 evidence supports: Blender exports for some statue/dragon cases were not byte-stable even when the canonical geometry / resulting VoxelPlan was deterministic. Please narrow the contract:
Avoid implementing a canonicalizer in this PR unless one already exists; this is primarily a documentation correction. 2. #124 completes the workflow-definition slice, not all #123 acceptance criteria#123 also requires real complex-build evidence:
Those are being handled by the parallel large-build benchmark/MinePilot work. Keep #123 open and keep this PR Draft until that evidence returns, or merge this as the canonical provisional workflow while explicitly leaving #123 open. Do not close #123 from this PR alone. Everything else in this docs slice looks aligned with the intended boundary: representation-fit routing, Luna-first policy, no landmark-specific primitives, no Blender runtime dependency, and VoxelPlan as the common downstream target. |
|
Final review of head The OBJ reproducibility contract now matches the actual #114/#119 evidence:
The PR remains correctly scoped to docs/workflow only. It does not add a premature composition helper, OBJ canonicalizer, Blender runtime dependency, or new semantic primitive. CI is green. This PR is ready to leave Draft and merge. Keep #123 open until the merge lands; after merge, the current benchmark evidence supports closing #123 as completed with |
Summary
llm.txt, and README.Validation
pnpm buildpassed.pnpm testpassed (218 tests).pnpm typecheckpassed.pnpm lintpassed.git diff --checkpassed.Refs #123