Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Converted to draft without the intention to merge. This seems to be fixed in DPDK 26. Unless a need arises for needing older DPDK, in which case this PR can be used as a backport, I would just use the newer one. |
Contributor
|
closed as it is not fork-based. reopen when needed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a DPDK patch to make EAL PCI argument work with multiport-eswitch and PF1. It is apparently fixed upsteam, so I just created a patch from a commit.
I suspect some newer DPDK will not need this anymore.
Thanks @guvenc to finding the fix in DPDK logs.
Fixes #782