Skip to content

ci: bump fleet-lint to v1.3.1 - #9

Merged
kleinbem merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/fleet-lint-v1.3.1
Nov 6, 2026
Merged

kleinbem merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/fleet-lint-v1.3.1

Conversation

@kleinbem

@kleinbem kleinbem commented Nov 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Moves the fleet-lint pin from kleinbem/actions v1.3.0 to v1.3.1 (kleinbem/actions#14): markdownlint only takes real config files as repo config, ruff runs isolated with a fixed rule set, gitleaks scans merge-commit resolutions, and the composite-action shellcheck follows each step's shell.

Tested: ran v1.3.1 locally against this repo's current main, and every check passed. It passed on all 29 repos.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the automated setup and lint checks to use version 1.3.1. No user-facing functionality changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@kleinbem
kleinbem enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2026 02:06
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Walkthrough

The fleet lint workflow updates the pinned revisions for the nix-setup and lint actions from v1.3.0 to v1.3.1.

Changes: Fleet lint workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update action pins
.github/workflows/fleet-lint.yaml
The nix-setup and lint actions now use revision f716d62182471a9e862ae0bd61d34201e6cea971 instead of fac6dda312df4b995db2fff7e8552945104b050c.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Possibly related PRs

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to e9425

The lint action update has no identified merge-blocking risk.

Architecture risk: Low · up to e9425

The changed surface does not map to a changed system, dependency edge, entrypoint, or external dependency.

Changed systems: None identified.

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in .github/workflows/fleet-lint.yaml: Both the nix-setup and lint actions were updated from revision fac6dda312df4b995db2fff7e8552945104b050c (v1.3.0) to f716d62182471a9e862ae0bd61d34201e6cea971 (v1.3.1).
Pre-merge checks: Passed 5

Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed The title accurately describes the fleet-lint update to v1.3.1.
Docstring Coverage Passed No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches

Generate unit tests (beta)

  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Recent review info

Run configuration

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe4950e and e9425ba.

Files selected for processing: 1

  • .github/workflows/fleet-lint.yaml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 2 remain after this review.

@kleinbem
kleinbem merged commit fcc250e into main Nov 6, 2026
3 checks passed
@kleinbem
kleinbem deleted the chore/fleet-lint-v1.3.1 branch November 6, 2026 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant