The inspected @modelcontextprotocol/server@2.0.0 and @modelcontextprotocol/core@2.0.0 packages declare MIT in their manifests, while their included LICENSE describes contribution-dependent MIT/Apache-2.0 coverage.
Could you clarify:
- Which license terms apply to these distributions, and whether the manifest labels need correction?
- Where consumers can find the component-level license mapping and required notices, including any bundled third-party components?
Reference source: cc4b41617ce3601b1290d67216ea0b194a3cd9ac.
The inspected
@modelcontextprotocol/server@2.0.0and@modelcontextprotocol/core@2.0.0packages declare MIT in their manifests, while their included LICENSE describes contribution-dependent MIT/Apache-2.0 coverage.Could you clarify:
Reference source:
cc4b41617ce3601b1290d67216ea0b194a3cd9ac.