Skip to content

docs: use ADR-NNNN in the conflict example so the citation check does not resolve it #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
lesnik512 merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

docs: use ADR-NNNN in the conflict example so the citation check does not resolve it #44

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/agents/domain.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal: either you'r

If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:

> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders), but worth reopening because…_
> _Contradicts ADR-NNNN (event-sourced orders), but worth reopening because…_
Loading