chore(deps): bump alembic from 1.19.1 to 1.20.0

[dependabot]

Bumps alembic from 1.19.1 to 1.20.0.

Release notes

Sourced from alembic's releases.

1.20.0

Released: September 11, 2026

usecase

• [usecase] [batch] Added a warning for the case where an unnamed CHECK constraint on a reflected table is omitted from a batch "recreate" operation. An unnamed CHECK constraint can't be reliably carried over in a batch recreate as it may refer to columns that are being dropped or changed. This omission was previously a silent operation. The presence of any ~sqlalchemy.schema.CheckConstraint in Operations.batch_alter_table.table_args is taken to indicate that the case has been accommodated, and no warning is emitted.

  References: #1846

• [usecase] [autogenerate] Autogenerate now renders a warning comment above any rendered Operations.drop_constraint() directive for which the constraint name is None, as is the case when a constraint that has no name in the model is dropped, most typically within the downgrade() function of a migration that adds an unnamed constraint. A warning is also emitted on the console when the migration script is generated. The directive requires a non-None name in order to be able to emit a "DROP CONSTRAINT" command.

  References: #916

bug

• [bug] [batch] Fixed bug in batch mode where adding a column with a type that generates its own CHECK constraint, such as ~sqlalchemy.types.Boolean or ~sqlalchemy.types.Enum with ~sqlalchemy.types.Boolean.create_constraint set to True, would emit the constraint twice when the table was recreated, once under the name generated by the naming convention in use and once under the name given to the type. The constraint is now emitted once, using the same name that would be used outside of batch mode.

  References: #1768

• [bug] [batch] Fixed bug in batch mode where a CHECK constraint generated by a type such as ~sqlalchemy.types.Boolean or ~sqlalchemy.types.Enum would lose the name established for it by the naming convention in use when the table was recreated, as the constraint was regenerated against the temporary table used for the recreate operation. The naming convention is now resolved against the name of the table being replaced.

... (truncated)

Commits

• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

---

This change is 

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 9b06fbe1-dab8-497c-af9d-446899863e86

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c7dc49b) to head (3f60441).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #649   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            7         7           
  Lines          172       172           
=========================================
  Hits           172       172           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.