OSDOCS-16959-ldap-identity-sync CQA

[wgabor0427]

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-16959

Link to docs preview:
https://116487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/authentication/ldap-syncing.html

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
The ldap-syncing-nesting.adoc module had a large amount of text before the prerequisites. Because of that I put that text in a new module named ldap-syncing-nesting-about.adoc. None of the text changed it was just moved to this new module. Not sure if that requires a SME review or not.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Wed Aug 12 20:10:35 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://116487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/authentication/ldap-syncing.html
https://116487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/authentication/ldap-syncing.html
https://116487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/authentication/ldap-syncing.html
https://116487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/authentication/ldap-syncing.html

[mburke5678]

@wgabor0427 A couple of copy/paste errors and we can knock this one down!

[wgabor0427]

I fixed all of the ones in the other modules to match like the ones above

[wgabor0427]

/test validate-asciidoc

[openshift-ci]

@wgabor0427: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #117889

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: #116487 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.22":

Patch is empty.
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To record the empty patch as an empty commit, run "git am --allow-empty".
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #117890

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #117891

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[mburke5678]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #117892

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.