Skip to content

NOOP: baseline for e2e-aws-ovn-conformance-serial-techpreview comparison - #31519

Closed
redhat-chai-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
redhat-chai-bot:noop-baseline-serial-techpreview
Closed

NOOP: baseline for e2e-aws-ovn-conformance-serial-techpreview comparison#31519
redhat-chai-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
redhat-chai-bot:noop-baseline-serial-techpreview

Conversation

@redhat-chai-bot

@redhat-chai-bot redhat-chai-bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a no-op PR (single blank line added to README.md) created as a baseline for comparing /payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-5.0-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance-serial-techpreview results.

The goal is to determine whether the 4h30m timeout seen on PR #31483 is reproducible on a clean noop PR, or was an anomaly.

This PR should be closed after the comparison is complete.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@neisw requested in Slack thread

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added spacing after the external examples documentation for improved readability.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review label Aug 14, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 14, 2026
@redhat-chai-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-5.0-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance-serial-techpreview


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@redhat-chai-bot: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-5.0-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance-serial-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/0ed9aac0-97ef-11f1-8631-f110c603b950-0

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: feebfb53-9a95-44b9-8cad-e8bd3a2b6019

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3bcb4b and ee82f81.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Walkthrough

The README gains one trailing blank line after the external examples documentation.

Changes

README Formatting

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add trailing blank line
README.md
Adds a blank line at the end of the README.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ee82f

This change only adds a harmless blank line to README.md, so no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15
✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the no-op baseline purpose and the specific e2e comparison described in the pull request.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed The exact commit changes only README.md by adding one blank line; it adds no Ginkgo test title or dynamic test-name content.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed The commit changes only README.md by adding one blank line; it introduces no Ginkgo tests or cluster operations, so the check is inapplicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The pull request changes only README.md by adding one blank line. It adds no Ginkgo e2e tests or MicroShift-incompatible API usage.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The PR diff adds only one blank line to README.md and adds no Ginkgo test or multi-node behavior.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The verified diff changes only README.md by adding one blank line; it modifies no deployment manifests, operators, controllers, or scheduling constraints.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed The exact diff changes only README.md by adding one trailing blank line; no OTE binary or process-level code changed.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed The pull-request diff adds only one blank line at the end of README.md; it adds no Ginkgo tests, IPv4 assumptions, or external connectivity.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed The PR diff contains only one added blank line at the end of README.md; it introduces no weak-crypto usage, custom crypto, or secret comparison code.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The patch changes only README.md by adding one blank line; it introduces no container or Kubernetes manifest and no listed privilege setting.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed The commit changes only README.md and adds one blank line; it introduces no logging code or sensitive data exposure path.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: redhat-chai-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign miyadav for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@neisw

neisw commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot closed this Aug 14, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@neisw: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants