Skip to content

stability-test-release-8.5-non-next-gen - 2026-10-17 18:04:24 - #6589

Closed
wk989898 wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:release-8.5from
wk989898:stability-test-release-8.5-20261017_180419-wuuanu
Closed

wk989898 wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:release-8.5from
wk989898:stability-test-release-8.5-20261017_180419-wuuanu

Conversation

@wk989898

@wk989898 wk989898 commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Automated stability test PR - adding empty line to Makefile

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a blank line to the Makefile; no user-facing behavior changed.

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by triage owners.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick:

  1. It must be LGTMed and approved by the reviewers firstly.
  2. For pull requests to TiDB-x branches, it must have no failed tests.
  3. AFTER it has lgtm and approved labels, please wait for the cherry-pick merging approval from triage owners.
Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Oct 17, 2026
@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-kafka-integration-light

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kennytm for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-light

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-heavy

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-storage-integration-light

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 17, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: f3d0c702-66b8-411f-9578-7a7eb793773f
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18c165f and bc2133e.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1
  • Makefile

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

A blank line was added after the check-next-gen-grafana target in the Makefile. No behavior changed.

Changes: Makefile whitespace

Layer / File(s) Summary
Makefile spacing
Makefile
A blank line was added after the check-next-gen-grafana target. No behavior changed.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: ti-chi-bot

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to bc213

This whitespace-only change has no identified impact on users or workflows and is ready to merge after normal checks.

### Architecture Summary

Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to bc213

The change affects 1 system.

Changed systems: Makefile

Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.

Review details

Systems and components

  • observed — Makefile (service) was modified; 1 changed file maps to changed impact.

Before / after behavior

  • observed — Modified behavior in Makefile: A blank line was added after the check-next-gen-grafana target.
Pre-merge checks: Passed 4 · Failed 1

Failed Failed checks: 1 warning

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check Warning The description identifies the automated stability test and the Makefile change, but it omits the required issue number, test checklist, compatibility and performance answers, documentation assessment… Add the required template sections. Include an issue reference, select or describe the applicable tests and results, answer the performance and compatibility questions, state whether documentation updates are needed, and add a release note …
Passed Passed checks: 4 passed
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title identifies the stability test release and timestamp. It is related to the pull request objective, although it does not mention the Makefile change.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description identifies the automated stability test and the Makefile change, but it omits the required issue number, test checklist, compatibility and performance answers, documentation assessment, and release note.

Resolution

Add the required template sections. Include an issue reference, select or describe the applicable tests and results, answer the performance and compatibility questions, state whether documentation updates are needed, and add a release note or None.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit spots a blank line’s place
And hops along with quiet grace
The target stays just as before
No new behavior through the door
One pause, then onward down the Makefile floor

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@wk989898 wk989898 closed this Oct 17, 2026
@wk989898
wk989898 deleted the stability-test-release-8.5-20261017_180419-wuuanu branch October 17, 2026 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant