WIP Lots of improvements - #898
Draft
snazy wants to merge 105 commits into
Draft
Conversation
snazy
force-pushed
the
broad-review-fixes
branch
20 times, most recently
from
July 23, 2026 15:31
57f38e8 to
48e5ab6
Compare
snazy
force-pushed
the
broad-review-fixes
branch
6 times, most recently
from
July 28, 2026 14:53
11e9436 to
e38a833
Compare
Update string-to-bool conversion to accept the CEL-Spec spellings while rejecting unsupported mixed-case values. Compare type values by CEL type name so well-known object type values match their built-in timestamp and duration type values. Allow null assignment to wrapper fields and leave wrapper, message, timestamp, and duration fields unset during protobuf construction. Support backtick-quoted field names in select expressions and message field initializers, then remove the now-passing conformance skips.
Handle CEL null values at the protobuf construction boundary for repeated and map fields whose value type is timestamp, duration, or a protobuf wrapper. Convert map message values to the actual target protobuf message type instead of always using google.protobuf.Value. Avoid hasField() for repeated wrapper fields when reading protobuf values, since repeated fields do not support presence checks.
The map Any null-retention conformance cases now pass after the protobuf map conversion changes. Remove the proto2 and proto3 skip entries so the JUnit conformance suite covers those cases.
Protobuf message construction could let bad field conversions escape as Java runtime exceptions, which broke disabled-check conformance cases expecting evaluation errors. Wrap field conversion and assignment failures from newValue() as CEL Err values, add provider coverage for invalid null assignments, and enable the remaining proto2/proto3 set_null conformance cases.
snazy
force-pushed
the
broad-review-fixes
branch
from
August 3, 2026 17:24
e38a833 to
b6bdf9e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.