Skip to content

[Bug]Deeply nested parentheses exhaust the C stack in parse_parentheses() recursion before PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM is reached (CWE-674, stack-overflow) #4252

Closed

Description

@1820893135-pixel

Hi,

While fuzzing prism, I found that a source consisting of many nested ( recurses through parse_parentheses() → parse_expression_prefix() → parse_expression() until the native C stack is exhausted, producing an ASan stack-overflow. The recursion guard (PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM, 10000) is never hit first, so the depth limit does not protect the parser from a stack-exhaustion denial of service.

Summary

Each unmatched ( recurses as follows (a 3-frame cycle):

/* src/prism.c */
parse_expression_prefix(parser, binding_power, flags, diag_id, depth) {   /* :19524 */
    ...
    case PM_TOKEN_PARENTHESIS_LEFT:
        return parse_parentheses(parser, depth);                          /* :19639 */
}

static pm_node_t *
parse_parentheses(pm_parser_t *parser, uint16_t depth) {                  /* :19325 */
    ...
    pm_node_t *statement = parse_expression(parser, PM_BINDING_POWER_STATEMENT, ..., (uint16_t)(depth + 1));  /* :19325 */
    ...
}

parse_expression() forwards the incremented depth, and the depth guard lives at src/prism.c:22601:

/* src/prism.c:22601, parse_expression() */
if (PRISM_UNLIKELY(depth >= PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM)) { ... /* too deep */ }
/* src/prism.c:50-51 */
#ifndef PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM
    #define PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM 10000
#endif

Because each nesting level pushes three C frames (parse_parentheses → parse_expression_prefix → parse_expression, plus locals), the native stack overflows long before depth reaches 10000. The threshold is reached at roughly 1600–1800 nested parentheses on the default 8 MB stack with ASan, far below the configured limit.

  • Affected versions: prism 1.9.0 (PRISM_VERSION "1.9.0"), commit 0a5f9c956cb62b371ab680868d08c82ae0d49201 (2026-10-09).
  • CWE: CWE-674 (Uncontrolled Recursion) → CWE-121 / stack exhaustion (denial of service).

Detail

Affected code

src/prism.c, parse_parentheses() (:19325) and parse_expression_prefix() (:19524). The depth counter is threaded through the recursion, but the check at parse_expression() (:22601) only fires at 10000 — the C stack is already exhausted by then.

Root cause: the recursion-depth limit is expressed in parser-logic units (one per expression), whereas each unit consumes several stack frames. With PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM = 10000 and a multi-frame recursion cycle, the depth budget is larger than the C stack can hold, so a linear input of nested parentheses aborts the process with a stack overflow.

Trigger path

pm_serialize_parse()                                       (src/prism.c:23505)
  -> pm_parse() -> parse_statements() -> parse_expression()
       -> parse_expression_prefix()                        (src/prism.c:19524)
            -> parse_parentheses()                          (src/prism.c:19325)
                 -> parse_expression()                      ([recurse])

Build the reproducer

git clone https://github.com/ruby/prism.git
cd prism
git checkout 0a5f9c956cb62b371ab680868d08c82ae0d49201
ruby templates/template.rb

Use the same driver.c as the companion report (prism-issue-1-file-keyword-null-serialize.md) and build:

clang -g -O1 -std=c99 -fsanitize=address,undefined -fno-sanitize-recover=all \
      -Iinclude -Isrc -I. driver.c src/*.c -lm -o repro

POC (tested on the unmodified source)

A 3201-byte file: 1600 (, then the byte 1, then 1600 ). Rebuild it:

python3 -c 'import sys; sys.stdout.buffer.write(b"("*1600 + b"1" + b")"*1600)' > poc.rb
sha256sum poc.rb
# must print: c8f2d8db37ce6652b4cf7da8af993bb379ba62fd47122d6df633abce3c494988
ls -l poc.rb     # 3201 bytes

(The trailing ) are not required to trigger it; a file of 1800 opening ( alone overflows as well. The 3201-byte file above is the fuzzer's minimised sample.)

Run:

./repro poc.rb

Trigger result

Verified on unmodified prism 1.9.0 (0a5f9c95) built as above:

==...==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-overflow on address 0x...
    #0 parse_expression_prefix   src/prism.c:19524
    #1 parse_expression          src/prism.c:22606
    #2 parse_parentheses         src/prism.c:19325
    #3 parse_expression_prefix   src/prism.c:19639
    #4 parse_expression          src/prism.c:22606
    #5 parse_parentheses         src/prism.c:19325
    ... (repeats until the stack is exhausted)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-overflow src/prism.c:19524 in parse_expression_prefix
  • Exit status: non-zero (ASan aborts on stack-overflow).
  • Threshold: about 1800 nested ( on the default 8 MB stack under ASan; 1200 does not overflow.
  • Deterministic: yes — the same file overflows on every run.
Image

Impact

A small, linear input of nested parentheses crashes the parser via stack exhaustion. Any tool that parses untrusted Ruby (servers, editors, linters, language tooling using pm_serialize_parse()) can be killed by a file on the order of a few kilobytes. Because the read is linear and cheap, this is an effective denial-of-service vector.

Suggested fix

Base the depth budget on the actual stack usage (or lower PRISM_DEPTH_MAXIMUM so the guard fires before the C stack is exhausted), e.g. count recursion in parse_parentheses()/parse_expression_prefix() and reject once a safe bound is reached:

/* src/prism.c, parse_parentheses() */
if (PRISM_UNLIKELY(depth >= PRISM_MAXIMUM_NESTING)) {
    pm_parser_err(parser, ..., PM_ERR_EXPRESSION_NOT_WRITABLE /* or a nesting error */);
    return NULL;
}

with PRISM_MAXIMUM_NESTING chosen so the guard fires with stack headroom for the three-frame-per-level recursion. Adding the 3201-byte input above to the regression corpus would prevent a re-introduction.

Activity

  1. kddnewton commented on Oct 13, 2026

    @kddnewton
    Collaborator

    Does this pass for you under -O2?

  2. kddnewton commented on Oct 13, 2026

    @kddnewton
    Collaborator

    Also, does this pass for you under -O1 without ASAN?

  3. 1820893135-pixel commented on Oct 14, 2026

    @1820893135-pixel
    Author

    Confirmed on master: nested parens parse fine under -O1/-O2, and the pattern recursion now hits the depth limit. Thanks for the fix (#4258).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions