Skip to content

Fix name of "ai-assisted" label in llm policy - #1089

Merged
jyn514 merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
steffahn:llm-assisted-label
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

Fix name of "ai-assisted" label in llm policy#1089
jyn514 merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
steffahn:llm-assisted-label

Conversation

@steffahn

@steffahn steffahn commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The actual label we created is called llm-assisted now.

It's a minimal change, but IMO this point was sufficiently confusing in practice that it's worth fixing sooner rather than later.
This is of course a minor change, following the policy's conditions for modification

Minor changes, such as typo fixes, only require a normal PR approval.

I've also opened a PR to fix the llm guidance in the dev-guide: rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#2962

Rendered

The actual label we created is called `llm-assisted` now.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 12, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @Urgau

rustbot has assigned @Urgau.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Fallback group: @Mark-Simulacrum, internal-sites
  • @Mark-Simulacrum, internal-sites expanded to Mark-Simulacrum, Urgau, ehuss, jieyouxu
  • Random selection from Mark-Simulacrum, Urgau, ehuss, jieyouxu

@jyn514
jyn514 merged commit f295930 into rust-lang:master Aug 13, 2026
1 check passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 13, 2026
@steffahn
steffahn deleted the llm-assisted-label branch August 14, 2026 01:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants