Skip to content

Rollup of 2 pull requests - #151584

Closed
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 6 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-blF5ZYz
Closed

Rollup of 2 pull requests#151584
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 6 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-blF5ZYz

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

folkertdev and others added 6 commits January 19, 2026 16:48
Hexagon assembler uses `.string` directive instead of `.asciz` for
null-terminated strings. Both are equivalent but the test was only
checking for `.asciz`.

Update the CHECK patterns to accept both directives using
`.{{asciz|string}}` regex pattern.
…bilee

add `simd_splat` intrinsic

Add `simd_splat` which lowers to the LLVM canonical splat sequence.

```llvm
insertelement <N x elem> poison, elem %x, i32 0
shufflevector <N x elem> v0, <N x elem> poison, <N x i32> zeroinitializer
```

Right now we try to fake it using one of

```rust
fn splat(x: u32) -> u32x8 {
    u32x8::from_array([x; 8])
}
```

or (in `stdarch`)

```rust
fn splat(value: $elem_type) -> $name {
    #[derive(Copy, Clone)]
    #[repr(simd)]
    struct JustOne([$elem_type; 1]);
    let one = JustOne([value]);
    // SAFETY: 0 is always in-bounds because we're shuffling
    // a simd type with exactly one element.
    unsafe { simd_shuffle!(one, one, [0; $len]) }
}
```

Both of these can confuse the LLVM optimizer, producing sub-par code. Some examples:

- rust-lang#60637
- rust-lang#137407
- rust-lang#122623
- rust-lang#97804

---

As far as I can tell there is no way to provide a fallback implementation for this intrinsic, because there is no `const` way of evaluating the number of elements (there might be issues beyond that, too). So, I added implementations for all 4 backends.

Both GCC and const-eval appear to have some issues with simd vectors containing pointers. I have a workaround for GCC, but haven't yet been able to make const-eval work. See the comments below.

Currently this just adds the intrinsic, it does not actually use it anywhere yet.
…ss35

Fix cstring-merging test for Hexagon target

Hexagon assembler uses `.string` directive instead of `.asciz` for null-terminated strings. Both are equivalent but the test was only checking for `.asciz`.

Update the CHECK patterns to accept both directives using `.{{asciz|string}}` regex pattern.
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jan 24, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 24, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit fb0b205 has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 24, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
JonathanBrouwer deleted the rollup-blF5ZYz branch August 21, 2026 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants