docs(research): establish Claude Code reasoning-summary transport - #266
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Sandstorm831
deleted the
research/261-claude-code-reasoning-summaries
branch
September 29, 2026 12:53
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Records the evidence for Establish whether Claude Code's direct stream-json transport emits reasoning summaries, and under which setting.
Seven isolated Claude Code 2.1.283 / Sonnet 4.6 runs establish summary enablement through showThinkingSummaries, display versus thinking-off controls, streamed and completed frames, absent titles, and the internal highlights fallback. The report compares these observations with Codex 0.155.0 generated app-server schemas and official documentation, and records model/provider/version limits. The Harness Seam event remains a separate decision.
Validation: reviewed primary sources and sanitized probe evidence; Prettier check and git diff --check pass. The canonical gate and release-consumer checks run in CI.
Merge with a merge commit so commit-pinned research links survive. Do not auto-close the research issue: its resolution, map index, and newly unblocked Starting context are published after merge.